摘要
如果说聚焦"体性"是为了凸显语文科区别于其他学科的种差,聚焦"类性"是为了区分文章视域下的各种文类差别,避免语文教学中将各种文类一锅煮的话,发掘文本的"篇性"则是为了区别不同作者的不同文本,或同一作者的不同文本的个性化表现力。从这个角度说,苏宁峰老师没有因循始于言语形式终于言语内容的文学解读或文化解读,而是牢牢坚守由言语形式到言语内容,再返回言语形式的语文解读,不断深入揭示文本的篇性,具有重要的语文学价值。
If the focus of“stylistic nature”is to highlight the difference between Chinese and other subjects,the focus of“category”is to distinguish the various cultural differences under the view of the article so as to avoid all kinds of articles being regarded as the same in the language teaching,then to explore the textual nature of texts is to distinguish the different expressions of different authors,or the individual expressive force of different texts of the same author.From this point of view,Mr.Su Ningfeng does not follow the literary interpretation or cultural interpretation that begins with the language form and ends with the language content,but firmly adheres to the language form to the language content,and then return to the language interpretation of the language form,and constantly reveals the textual nature of the text,which has important linguistic and literary value.
作者
汲安庆
JI Anqing(College of Chinese Language and Literature,Dali University,Dali,Yunnan,671003,China)
出处
《教育与教学研究》
2018年第6期60-66,127,共8页
Education and Teaching Research
关键词
语文教学
文本解读
文学解读
文化解读
语文解读
Chinese teaching
text interpretation
literary interpretation
cultural interpretation
Chinese interpretation