期刊文献+

循证护理在腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤切除术患者中的应用 被引量:2

Study of the application of evidence-based nursing model in patients who conducted hysteromyomectomy under laparoscopy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨循证护理模式在腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤切除术后患者中的应用效果。方法:将63例腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤切除术后的患者随机分为对照组(33例)和实验组(30例),对照组患者术后给予常规临床护理,实验组在此基础上术后给予循证护理,分别在患者入院时和出院时用抑郁自评量表(SDS)及焦虑自评量表(SAS)对两组患者的抑郁和焦虑情况进行评价。结果:出院时,对照组的SDS和SAS评分分别为47.21±9.823分和49.06±10.983分,与入院时比较,差异均有统计学意义(t=5.020,P<0.01)、(t=6.104,P<0.01);实验组的SDS和SAS评分分别为(39.70±7.715)分和(40.60±7.204)分,与入院时比较,差异也有统计学意义(t=9.148,P<0.01)、(t=11.278,P<0.01)。出院时,两组SDS评分和SAS评分差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),实验组的SDS和SAS评分降低幅度均大于对照组。结论:循证护理模式可有效改善腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤切除术患者的抑郁和焦虑情绪,促进患者的预后。 Objective:To explore the application effect of evidence-based nursing model in patients who conducted hysteromyomectomy under laparoscopy.Methods:Sixty-three patients who conducted hysteromyomectomy under laparoscopy were randomly divided into control group(n=33)and experimental group(n=30).The patients in control group were given routine nursing and the patients in experimental group were given evidence-based nursing.All the patients were measured the depression and anxiety with SDS and SAS when they were admitted to hospital and out of hospital.Results:After the intervention,SDS and SAS of control group was 47.21±9.823(t=5.020,P<0.01)and 49.06±10.983(t=6.104,P<0.01),respectively;SDA and SAS of experimental group was 39.70±7.715(t=9.148,P<0.01)and 40.60±7.204(t=11.278,P<0.01).After the intervention,there was a significant differences of SDS between the two groups,the SAS also had a significant differences(P<0.01).Conclusions:The evidence-based nursing model can improve the negative emotion of the patients who conducted hysteromyomectomy under laparoscopy and promote the recovery of patients.
作者 曹兰兰 张梅香 吴江玲 李亚萍 徐茜茜 CAO Lan-lan;ZHANG Mei-xiang;WU Jiang-ling(The Second People's Hospital of Lu'an City,Lu'an 237000,Anhui)
出处 《安徽卫生职业技术学院学报》 2018年第3期119-120,122,共3页 Journal of Anhui Health Vocational & Technical College
关键词 循证护理 腹腔镜 子宫肌瘤 SDS SAS Evidence-based nursing laparoscopy Uterine fibroid SDS SAS
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献62

  • 1王欢,顾海伦,段景柱,周凤华.焦虑与腰椎间盘突出症术后疗效的关系[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2004,12(15):1137-1139. 被引量:18
  • 2吴文源.抑郁自评量表(SDS)[J].上海精神医学,1990,2:41-41.
  • 3王春芳 蔡则环 等.抑郁自评量表-SDS对1340例正常人评定分析[J].中国神经精神疾病杂志,1986,12(5):267-267.
  • 4刘贤臣,孙良民,唐茂芹,刘连启,杨杰,马登岱,赵贵芳.2462名青少年焦虑自评量表测查结果分析[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1997,11(2):75-77. 被引量:148
  • 5赵俊,李树人,宋文阁,主编.疼痛诊断治疗学.郑州:河南医科大学出版社,1990,201-202.
  • 6Levy HI, Hanscom B, Boden SD. Three-question depr- ession screener used for lumbar disc hemiations and spinal stenosis. Spine, 2002, 27:1232- 1237.
  • 7Remes V, Tervahartiala P, Poussa M, et al. Thoracic and lumbar spine in diastrophic dysplasia: a clinical and mag- netic resonance imaging analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2001, 26:187 - 195.
  • 8Trief PM, Grant W, Fredrickson B. A prospective study of psycho-logical predictors of lumbar surgery outcome. Spine, 2000, 25:2616 - 2621.
  • 9汪向东.焦虑自评量表.中国心理卫生杂志,1993,14:205-208.
  • 10Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry disability index. Spine, 2000, 25:2940 - 2953.

共引文献84

同被引文献13

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部