期刊文献+

基于失效概率法的桥梁地震风险评估 被引量:7

Earthquake Risk Assessment of Bridge Based on Failure Probability Method
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了研究地震破坏下高速铁路连续梁桥发生破坏的可能性,根据地震风险性(risk)为地震危险性(hazard)与易损性(fragility)乘积的定义,基于失效概率法,对高速铁路连续梁桥地震风险评估方法进行了分析.通过条带法建立桥梁地震需求模型,基于可靠度函数获得桥梁地震易损性曲线,拟合得到桥梁易损性概率密度函数;根据桥址处地震危险性资料,推导桥址处地震加速度概率密度函数;通过地震加速度概率密度函数与桥梁结构易损性概率密度函数的数值积分,实现桥梁地震风险概率评估.以一座(32+48+32)m高速铁路连续梁桥为例系统演绎了失效概率法桥梁风险评估的实现过程.研究结果表明:当地震危险性资料缺乏或不足时可以通过地震烈度分布函数及其与地震峰值加速度之间的换算关系,推导和完善地震危险性分析资料;对于高速铁路(32+48+32)m连续梁桥100年设计期间内发生轻微损伤的概率为5.16%,发生中等损伤的概率为4.46%,桥梁受到轻微损伤和中等损伤风险概率接近,几乎不可能发生严重损伤和完全破坏. To study the possibility of destruction of a high-speed railway continuous girder bridge under the influence of seismic damage,a seismic risk assessment of the bridge was conducted.The failure probability method was used,in which seismic risk is defined as the product of seismic hazard and fragility(i.e.,seismic risk=seismic hazard×fragility).The bridge seismic demand model was established using the strip coating method.The bridge seismic fragility curve was obtained based on the reliability function,and the probability density function of the bridge fragility was fitted.According to seismic risk data of the bridge site,the probability density function of seismic acceleration of the bridge site was derived.The probability density function of seismic acceleration was numerically integrated with that of the bridge structural vulnerability to accomplish the probability evaluation of the bridge earthquake risk.Taking a(32+48+32)m high-speed railway continuous girder bridge as an example,the system conducted the bridge risk assessment using the failure probability method.The results show that when earthquake risk data are lacking or insufficient,it is possible to deduce and improve seismic risk analysis data using the conversion relation between the earthquake intensity distribution function and the seismic peak acceleration.For the high-speed railway(32+48+32)m continuous girder bridge,within 100 years of use,the occurrence probability of slight damage is 5.16%and that of secondary damage is 4.46%.The probabilities of slight damage and secondary damage risk of the bridge are similar,whereas the probabilities of serious damage and complete destruction are very small,indicating that serious damage and complete destruction are almost impossible.
作者 韩兴 崔圣爱 崔恩旗 苏姣 祝兵 HAN Xing;CUI Sheng’ai;CUI Enqi;SU Jiao;ZHU Bing(School of Civil Engineering,Southwest Jiaotong University,Chengdu 610031,China)
出处 《西南交通大学学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2018年第4期696-703,共8页 Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University
基金 中国铁路总公司科技计划资助项目(2013G002-A-2)
关键词 桥梁工程 失效概率法 地震风险评估 条带分析法 连续梁桥 bridge engineering failure probability method earthquake risk assessment strip method continuous beam bridge
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献16

  • 1H.Hwang,刘晶波.地震作用下钢筋混凝土桥梁结构易损性分析[J].土木工程学报,2004,37(6):47-51. 被引量:184
  • 2吕大刚,李晓鹏,王光远.基于可靠度和性能的结构整体地震易损性分析[J].自然灾害学报,2006,15(2):107-114. 被引量:115
  • 3高小旺.地震作用的概率模型及其统计参数[J].地震工程与工程振动,1985,(1):13-22.
  • 4Lupoi A, Franchin P, Schotanus M. Seismic risk evaluation of RC bridge strueture[J]. Earthquake Engi neering and Structural Dynamics, 2003,32 (8): 1275-1290.
  • 5刘恢先.修订我国地震烈度表的一个建议方案[M].北京:科学出版社,1981.
  • 6Park Y J, Ang A H, Wen Y K. Mechanistic seismic damage model for RC[J]. ASCE, 1985,111 (4) :724-730.
  • 7颜海泉,王君杰.飘浮体系斜拉桥纵向抗震计算的单塔模型[J].地震工程与工程振动,2007,27(4):80-86. 被引量:8
  • 8胡勃.桥梁抗震概率性设计方法的研究[D].上海:同济大学,2000.
  • 9LUCO N, CORNELL C A. Effects of Connection Fractures on SMRF Seismic Drift Demands [ J ]. Journal of Structural Engineering 2000, 126 ( 1 ) : 127 - 136.
  • 10SHINOZUKA M, FENG M Q, LEE J, NAGANUMA T. Statistical Analysis of Fragility Curves [ J ]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2000, 126 (12) : 1224- 1231.

共引文献23

同被引文献70

引证文献7

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部