期刊文献+

个人信息权保护的法律界限研究--基于欧洲人权法院50个判例的分析 被引量:9

The Research of the Legal Boundary of Personal Data Right Protection:Based on the Analysis of 50 Human Rights Cases of European Court
下载PDF
导出
摘要 个人信息权是一种新兴权利,与日益扩张的国家监控权针锋相对。《欧洲人权公约》第八条从个人和家庭隐私的角度,对个人信息权作出了规定。欧洲人权法院的50个相关判例涵盖英国、法国、德国、瑞士、俄罗斯等不同法系的国家,涉及健康隐私、私密声音、私人通信等个人信息,缔约国败诉率高达三分之二,明确表明保护个人信息的法律限度:对个人信息的收集、储存、使用、披露、查询、删除等监控和干预必须依法、善意、必要进行,以充分保障人权。我国应当以"保护为原则,干涉为例外",立法保护个人信息权,夯实合法性基础;合理善用国家监控权,找准合目的方向;最低程度平衡权益冲突,把握合比例性原则,进一步完善个人信息的法律保护。 The right of personal data is an emerging right,which is coming against the daily expanding national surveillance power.The Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights regulates the personal data rights from the perspective of personal and family privacy.The 50 cases ruled by the European Court of Human Rights involve the UK,France,Germany,Switzerland,Russia and many other countries of different legal systems,concern about the health information,personal voice and private communication.The rate of the countries losing lawsuits reaches nearly two thirds,which demonstrates that the collection,reservation,usage,publish,search and deletion of personal data by the government must be confined within the law-abiding principles,goodwill and necessity,so that the human rights can be effectively protected.China should adopt“protection as a principle and intervention as an exception”to legislate to protect the right of personal information and to strengthen the basis for legitimacy;to make reasonable use of state monitoring power and to find a suitable direction;to minimize the balance of rights and interests,and to grasp the principle of proportionality,and further improve the legal protection of personal information.
作者 闵丰锦 MIN Fengjin(Law School,Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120,China)
出处 《重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版)》 2018年第4期56-66,共11页 Journal of Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications(Social Science Edition)
基金 西南政法大学学生科研创新计划资助项目:论新型检律关系之构建(2016XZXS-166) 国家人权教育与培训基地西南政法大学人权研究院人权专项课题研究项目:人权保障视域下的刑事假案监督研究(HRI2017B004)
关键词 隐私权 人格权 个人信息 国家监控 欧洲人权公约 privacy right personality right personal data national surveillance European convention on human rights
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

二级参考文献478

共引文献315

同被引文献116

引证文献9

二级引证文献70

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部