期刊文献+

抗反流手术与抑酸药物治疗胃食管反流病降低食管腺癌发生风险的meta分析 被引量:3

Comparison between Antireflux Surgery and Antacids for Gastroegsophageal Reflux Disease in the Prevention of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较抗反流手术及药物治疗胃食管反流病(gastroesophageal reflux disease,GERD)对预防食管腺癌(esophagus adenocarcinoma,EAC)发生的效果。方法以esophagus、neoplasm、cancer、Barrett's esophagus、adenocarcinoma、fundoplication、antireflux surgery、Nissen等为英文检索词,以食道、良性肿瘤、癌、巴瑞特食管、腺癌、胃底折叠术抗反流手术、Nissen术式、胃食管反流病、质子泵抑制剂等为中文检索词,检索Pub Med、EMBASE、Cochrane library、Web of Science、万方、中国知网等数据库自建库至2017年4月,关于药物及手术治疗GERD的相关文献,设立纳入与排除标准筛选文献,并进行资料提取与偏倚评估。结果最终纳入文献7篇,其中3篇为随机对照试验(RCT)研究、4篇为回顾性病例对照研究,共纳入病例78 703例,其中手术治疗患者11 398例(手术组),药物治疗患者67 305例(药物组)。meta分析结果示:手术组与药物组患者相比,癌变率比较差异并无统计学意义(RR=1.10,95%CI:0.81,1.49,P=0.54);然而剔除病例数占比最大的研究后,药物组癌变率高于手术组(RR=0.38,95%CI:0.15,0.97,P=0.04)。结论对于GERD伴或不伴Barrett食管患者癌变率方面,抗反流手术优于药物治疗。但抗反流手术用于此类患者预防EAC的发生仍需进一步大样本、长期随访的RCT研究来验证。 Objective To compare the preventive effect of antireflux surgery and antacids in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease(GERD)on esophageal adenocarcinoma(EAC).Methods A computerized literature search of multiple electronic databases was performed on PubMed,EMBASE,Cochrane Library,Web of science,Wanfang and CNKI database for related literature on drug and surgical treatment of GRED from an unbounded start date to 2017,using English terms such as esophagus,neoplasm,cancer,Barrett's esophagus,adenocarcinoma,fundoplication,antireflux surgery,Nissen,Gastroesophageal reflux disease,Proton pump inhibitors and Chinese equivalents.The inclusion and exclusion criteria were set up for quality evaluation,data extraction and bias assessment.Results Seven academic papers were included in the Meta-analysis,including three RCTs,four case-control studies with 78 703 cases,of which there were 11 398 cases who received antireflux surgery(surgerical treatment group)and 67 305 cases who received drug treatment(drug treatment group).The results of the Meta-analysis showed that there was no difference in canceration rate between surgical treatment group and drug treatment group(RR=1.10,95%CI:0.81,1.49,P=0.54).After the research of Ye were eliminated,and Meta-analysis showed that canceration rate in drug treatment group was higher than that in surgical treatment group(RR=0.38,95%CI:0.15,0.97,P=0.04).Conclusion In terms of canceration rate in patients with GERD with or without BE,antireflux surgery is superior to drug treatment.However,RCTS with larger sample size and long-term follow-up data are needed to confirm the role of antireflux surgery in the prevention of EAC.
作者 张育先 张若蹊 刘殿刚 高翔 张超 汪忠镐 ZHANG Yu-xian;ZHANG Ruo-xi;LIU Dian-gang;GAO Xiang;ZHANG Chao;WANG Zhong-gao(Department of Gastroenterology,Beijing Moslem Hospital,Beijing 100054,China;Department of General Surgery,Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University,Beijing 100053,China)
出处 《临床误诊误治》 2018年第7期106-110,共5页 Clinical Misdiagnosis & Mistherapy
基金 北京市215高层次卫生技术人才学术骨干项目(2015-3-066) 中国科学院学部咨询评议项目(B-SM-2017-01)
关键词 胃食管反流 BARRETT食管 抗反流手术 META分析 Gastroesophageal reflux Barrett esophagus Antireflux surgery Meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献58

  • 1侯晓华,郑丽端,王道蓉.Barrett食管的病因与流行病学[J].中华消化杂志,2006,26(2):114-115. 被引量:23
  • 2Herllhy KJ, Orlando BC, Bryson JC,et al. Barrett's esophagus: clinical, endoscopic, histologic, manometric, and electrical potential difference characteristics[ J]. Gastroenterology, 1984,86(3 ) : 436-.443.
  • 3Lagarde SM, ten Kate FJ, Reitsma JB, et al. Prognostic factors in adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction[ J ]. J Clin Oncol,2006, 24(26) :4347-4355.
  • 4Casson AG, Williams L, Guernsey DL. Epidemiology and molecular biology of Barrett esophagus[ J]. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2005,17 (4) :284-291.
  • 5Caygill CP,Watson A, Reed PI, et al. Characteristics and regional variations Of patients with Barrett's oesophagus in the UK[ J]. Eur J Gastmenterol Hepatol, 2003, 15 ( 11 ) : 1217-1222.
  • 6Csendes A, Smok G, Quiroz J, et al. Clinical, endoscopic, and functional studies in 408 patients with Barrett's esophagus, compared to 174 cases of intestinal metaplasia of the cardia[J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2002, 97(3) :554-560.
  • 7Hirota WK, Loughney TM, Lazas DJ, et al. Specialized intestinal metaplasia, dysplasia and cancer of the esophagus and esophagugastric junction : Prevalence and clinical data[ J ]. Gastroenterology, 1999,116 (2) :277-285.
  • 8Sampline RE. Updated guidelines for the diagnosis, surveillance, and therapy of Barrett's esophagus [ J ]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2002,97 ( 8 ) : 1888-1895.
  • 9Avidan B, Sonnenberg A, Schnell TG, et al. There are no reliable symptoms for erosive oesophagitis and Barrett's oesophagus: endoscopic diaguosis is still essential[ J ]. Aliment Pharmacol Ther,2002,16 (4) : 735 -742.
  • 10Caum LC, Bizinelli SL, Pisani JC, et al. Specialized intestinal metaplasia of the distal esophagus in gastroesophageal reflux disease: prevalence and clinico-demographic features[ J ]. Arq Gastroenterol,2003, 40(4) :220-226.

共引文献36

同被引文献42

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部