食道癌采用不同术式治疗的临床效果研究

Clinical Effect of Different Operative Methods on Esophageal Carcinoma

目的探究采用不同术式的治疗方法对于食道癌患者的治疗效果。方法将2010年6月~2016年8月在我院以及其他医院接受治疗的食道癌患者60例分为A、B、C三组,每组20例。对比三组的治疗效果以及相关指标。结果三组患者整体来说手术较顺利,其中A组出血量大于B、C两组,B、C两组患者的住院总时间和手术时间均小于A组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);A组并发症发生率明显高于B、C两组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论胸腔镜辅助食管癌根治术和胸、腹腔镜联合食道癌手术的方法的治疗效果以及各方面的指标要优于传统的三切口食管癌根治手术,值得临床推广。

Objective To explore the therapeutic effect of different surgical methods for the patients with esophageal cancer.Methods 60 patients with esophageal cancer treated in our hospital and other hospitals in June 2010~August 2016 divided into three groups:A,B and C,with 20 cases in each group.The therapeutic effects and related indexes of the three groups were compared.Results Three groups of patients with general surgery successfully,which A group blood loss more than B,C two groups,B,C two groups of patients with the total hospitalization time and operation time were less than A group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05);complication rate of group A was significantly higher than that of B and C two groups,there was statistical significant differences(P<0.05).Conclusion Thoracoscopic assisted radical esophagectomy and thoracoscopic and laparoscopic combined with esophageal cancer surgery are better than the traditional three incision esophageal cancer radical surgery.