期刊文献+

舒芬太尼经鼻给药与静脉给药在纤维结肠镜检查中疗效对比 被引量:1

Comparison of Efficacy of Sufentanil between Nasal and Intravenous Administration in Fibrocolonoscopy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探究经鼻与经静脉的不同舒芬太尼给药方式应用在纤维肠镜的检查期间的临床效果。方法选取2016年7月~2017年7月我院收治的62例患者的临床资料,依据给药方式分为对照组与研究组,每组31例。对照组行舒芬太尼静脉给药,研究组行舒芬太尼鼻滴给药,分析两组生命指标与临床指标。结果研究组的心率与MAP低于对照组,Sp O2高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);研究组的临床指标相比对照组指标优,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论纤维肠镜在检查时经鼻使用舒芬太尼临床效果更好,患者生命体征稳定,药物对呼吸抑制功能弱,有临床推广价值。 Objective To investigate the clinical effect of different administration of sufentanil through nose and vein during fiberenteroscopy.Methods The clinical data of 62 patients admitted in our hospital in July 2016~July 2017 were divided into the control group and the study group,with 31 cases in each group.The control group was treated with sufentanil intravenous administration,the study group was treated with sufentanil nasal drops,and the two groups of life indexes and clinical indexes were analyzed.Results The heart rate and MAP of the study group were lower than those of the control group,SpO2 was higher than that of the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05),and the clinical index of the study group was superior to that of the control group,with a statistically significant difference(P<0.05).Conclusion When fiber colonoscopy is used for examination,the clinical effect of sufentanil through nose is better,the vital signs of patients are stable,and the drug has a weak respiratory inhibition function,so it has the value of clinical promotion.
作者 龚立云 GONG Li-yun(Department of Pharmacy,Zhongxiang People's Hospital,Zhongxiang 431900,Hubei,China)
出处 《医学信息》 2018年第6期135-136,共2页 Journal of Medical Information
关键词 舒芬太尼 经鼻给药 静脉给药 纤维结肠镜 Sufentanil Transnasal Intravenous Fiberoptic colonoscopy
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献43

  • 1佘守章,李慧玲,许学兵,莫世湟.右旋美托咪啶的镇静效应及其对全麻镇静深度的影响[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2006,22(1):10-12. 被引量:105
  • 2何电波,唐生友,易科新.芬太尼、麻黄碱和丙泊酚序贯用于无痛人流的观察[J].中国医药导报,2007,4(01Z):91-92. 被引量:11
  • 3张惠,徐礼鲜,葛雅丽,张劲松,于代华.丙泊酚人脑中枢作用部位的功能磁共振成像分析[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2007,23(1):38-40. 被引量:6
  • 4Sakurai Y, Obata T, Odaka A, et al. Buccal administra- tion of dexmedetomidine as a preanesthetic in children [ J ]. J Anesth, 2010,24( 1 ) :49-53.
  • 5Lecomte P, 'Ouattara A, Le Manach ~, et al. The coro- nary and myocardial effects of remifentanil and sufentanil in the erythrocyte-perfused isolated rabbit heart [ J ]. Anesth Analg, 2006,103 ( 1 ) :9-14.
  • 6Derer K, Sucullu I, Budak E T, et al. A comparison of dexmedetomidine versus midazolam for sedation, pain and hemodynamic control, during colonoscopy under conscious sedation [ J ]. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2010,27 ( 7 ) : 648-652.
  • 7Cardiotti K A, Bergess S D, Bokesch P M, et al. Moni- tored anesthesia care with dexmedetomidine: a prospec- tive, randomized, doubleblind, multieenter trial [J]. Anesth Analg, 2010,110(12) :47-56.
  • 8Cooper L, Candiotti K, Gallagher C, et al. A random- ized, controlled trial on dexmedetomidine for providing dequate sedation and hemodynamic control for awake, di- agnostic transesophageal echocardiography [ J 1 ~ J Cardio- thorac Vasc Anesth, 2011,25 (2) :233-237.
  • 9Demiraran Y, Korkut E, Tamer A, et al. The comparison of dexmedetomidine and midazolam used for sedation of patients during upper endoscopy: A prospective, random- ized study[ Jl ~ Can J Gastroenterol, 2007,21 ( 1 ) :25-29.
  • 10LaPierre CD, Johnson KB, Randall BR, et al. A simulation study of common propofol and propofol-opioid dosing regimens for upper endoscopy., implications on the time course of recovery. Anesthesiology, 2012,117(2) :252-262.

共引文献83

同被引文献12

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部