期刊文献+

导流角和凹面腔深度对2级PDE中激波聚焦的影响

Effect of Diversion Angle and Concave Cavity Depth on Shock Wave Focusing in 2-Stage PDE
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了研究凹面腔内激波聚焦的机理以及导流角和凹面腔深度对激波聚焦的影响,在不同导流角和凹面腔深度条件下开展了3维凹面腔内激波聚焦的数值模拟,对各测量点的压力和温度进行分析。结果表明:合适的导流角有利于激波聚焦,导流角为25°时凹面腔底部的峰值压力和温度最高,激波聚焦效果最好;合适的凹面腔深度有利于激波聚焦,凹面腔深度为25 mm时凹面腔底部的峰值压力和温度最高,激波聚焦效果最好。 In order to research the mechanism of shock wave focusing in concave cavity and the influence of diversion angle and concave cavity depth on shock wave focusing,the numerical simulation of shock wave focusing in 3D concave cavity was carried out under the condition of different diversion angle and concave cavity depth.The pressure and temperature of each measuring point were analyzed.The results show that the proper angle of diversion is favorable for shock wave focusing,and the peak pressure and temperature at the bottom of concave cavity are the highest when the diversion angle is 25°,and the effect of shock wave focusing is the best曰The proper depth of the concave cavity is favorable for shock wave focusing,and the peak pressure and the temperature at the bottom of the concave cavity are the highest when the concave cavity depth is 25 mm,and the effect of shock wave focusing is the best
作者 赵坤 何立明 曾昊 赵晨瑞 王浩 张伟东 陈月 ZHAO Kun;HE Li-ming;ZENG Hao;ZHAO Chen-rui;WANG Hao;ZHANG Wei-dong;CHEN Yue(College of Aeronautics Engineering,Air Force Engineering University,Xi'an 710038,China;Unit**,the Chinese People's Liberation Army,Cangzhou Hebei 061700,China;Unit**,the Chinese People's Liberation Army,Cangzhou Hebei 061700,China)
出处 《航空发动机》 北大核心 2018年第4期16-20,共5页 Aeroengine
基金 国家自然科学基金(91541109、51406234)资助。
关键词 2级脉冲爆震发动机 激波聚焦 导流角 凹面腔深度 数值模拟 two-stage pulse detonation engine shock wave focusing diversion angle concave cavity depth numerical simulation
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献29

  • 1曾昊,何立明,罗俊,康强,李海鹏.过渡段对爆震波衍射过程的影响分析[J].推进技术,2009,30(3):366-369. 被引量:2
  • 2姜日红,武晓松,王栋.共振型PDE谐振腔喷嘴匹配关系研究[J].航空动力学报,2009,24(5):1006-1010. 被引量:16
  • 3Lu F K, Meyers J M, Wilson D R. Experimental study of a pulse detonation rocket with shchelkin spiral [ A ]. Proceedings of the 24^th International Symposium on Shock Waves ( Volume 2 )[C]. Beijing : Tsinghua University Press and Spring-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2005.
  • 4Roy G D, Frolov S M, Borisov A A, et al. Pulse detonation propulsion: challenges, current status, and future perspective [ J]. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2004,30 ( 2 ).
  • 5Tangirala V E, Dean A J, Chapin D M. Pulse detonation engine progress: experiments and simulations [ J]. Combust Sci. Tech. ,200d, 76(6).
  • 6Medvedev S P, Khomik S V, Gelfand B E, et al. Shock tube study of hydrogen-Air detonation induced by shock focussing [ A ]. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Shock Wave Focusing Phenomena in Combustible Mixtures: Ignition and Transition to Detonation of Reactive Media Under Geometrical Constraints [ C ]. Aachen, Germany, 1998.
  • 7Levin V A, Nechaev J N, Tarasov A I. A new approach to organizing operation cycles in pulse detonation engines [ C ]. Moscow : High-Speed Deflagration and Detonation: Fundamentals and Control, 2001.
  • 8Ivett A L, Venkat T, Anthony J D. Investigation of unsteady flow field in a 2-Stage PDE resonator [ R]. AIAA 2003-0715.
  • 9Keith R M, Anthony J D. Experimental evaluation of a two-stage pulse detonation combustor [ R ]. AIAA 2005- 3773.
  • 10KONNOV A A. Refinement of the kinetic mechanism of hydrogen combustion [ J ]. Khimicheskaya Fizika, 2004, 23 (8).

共引文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部