冲突与互补:海域划界争端解决方式之谈判与裁判

Conflicts and Complementarities: Settlement of Maritime Delimitation Disputes with Negotiation and Adjudication

通过和平方式解决国际争端是国际法的基本原则,具体到海域划界争端的和平解决,谈判仍然是最主要的方式,与此同时,提请裁判解决海域划界争端的案例也层出不穷。海域划界争端解决之谈判与裁判方式各有其特点:谈判方式体现了政治与法律的交织,具有充分的灵活性;裁判方式则变相促进了海域划界法律规则的细化和进步。通过分析谈判和裁判两种方式在海域划界争端解决中的适用,可以考察发现二者在海域划界争端解决中的冲突和互补。合理地认识并利用好谈判和裁判方式在国际法上的冲突性与互补性,将有助于国家间更好地化解海域划界争端,有利于促进对海域进行综合治理与开发。

The settlement of international disputes with peaceful modes is a basic principle of international law.In peaceful settlement of maritime delimitation disputes,negotiation is still the main mode,while adjudicated cases are continually emerging.The modes of negotiation and adjudication in settlement of maritime delimitation disputes have their own characteristics respectively in international law.Negotiation has the advantages of flexibility with combining the law and politics,while the adjudication has promoted the development of the theory of maritime delimitation.Through the analysis of the application of negotiation and adjudication in settlement of maritime delimitation disputes,we can figure out the conflicts and complementarities between them.Finally,this thesis draws the corresponding conclusion:by recognizing the conflicts and complementarities of negotiation and adjudication in international law,it would be helpful for parties to settle maritime delimitation disputes,therefore,it would promote the comprehensive management of maritime zones.