期刊文献+

私募股权投资中估值调整协议法律效力的认定

The Legal Effect of Valuation Adjustment Agreement in Private Equity Investment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 近年来,随着私募股权投资基金等金融创新的飞速发展,估值调整协议(在学界被普遍称为估值调整协议)应运而生。估值调整协议本质上是一种对融资企业的估值调整机制,其目的在于降低投资方的投资风险。由于我国行政监管制度的不健全,对估值调整协议的法律规定甚少,特别是在司法实践中对估值调整协议是否有效的认定问题上存在很大的分歧。从估值调整协议的基本概念理论入手,剖析我国估值调整协议效力的认定现状,阐述估值调整协议效力认定的基本步骤,并对估值调整协议的完善提出建议。 In recent years,with the rapid development of financial innovations such as private equity investment fund,the gambling agreement has emerged.The gambling agreement is essentially a valuation adjustment mechanism for financing enterprises,which aims to reduce the investment risk of the investors.Due to our country s administrative supervision system is not sound,to bet against agreement law,especially has a great deal of disagreement on the issue of whether the valuation adjustment agreement is valid in judicial practice.Start from the basic concept of theory of bet against the agreement,analysis of the status quo of China s valuation adjustment agreement to determine the status quo,and further elaborated the basic steps of the effectiveness of valuation adjustment agreement,and to improve their valuation adjustment agreement put forward their own suggestions.
作者 陆慧 LU Hui(Shandong University of Science and Technology,Qingdao 276800,China)
出处 《黑龙江生态工程职业学院学报》 2018年第4期37-39,共3页 Journal of Heilongjiang Vocational Institute of Ecological Engineering
关键词 投资风险 私募股权 估值调整协议 法律效力 合同 The investment risk Private equity Private Equity Legal effect The contract
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献20

  • 1徐玮.《国际投行与国内企业对赌演绎大开大合故事》,载《中国证券报》2007年8月25日第9版.
  • 2See John Armour, Share Capital and Creditor Protection : Efficient Rules for a Modem Company Law, The Modem Law Review Limited 2000.
  • 3See Eilis Femm, Company Law and Corporate Finance, Oxford University Press, 1999, P355 -372.
  • 4Ellis Ferran, Creditors' Interests and " core " Company Law, Copyright(c) 1999 Sweet & Maxwell Limited and Contributors.
  • 5John Armour, Capital Maintenance , School of Law, University of Nottingham, and ESRC center for Business Research,University of Cambridge, Working Paper Series.
  • 6Petetson, Craig A. , and Hawker, Norman W. (1997),"Does Corporate Law Matter? Legal Capital Restrictions on Stock Distributions", 31 Akron Law Review 175 -227.
  • 7See John Armour, Share Capital and Creditor Protection :Efficient Rules for a Modem Company Law, The Modem Law Review , May 2000.
  • 8方嘉麟.论资本三原则理论体系之内在矛盾[J]..
  • 9政大法学评论,.
  • 10See Laurie Factor, Capital maintenance: Simplification and Creditor Protection, Australian Journal of Corporate Law , 1995 ,Volume 5.

共引文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部