期刊文献+

英语致使交替句法研究——以break为例

The Syntax of Causative-unaccusative Alternation: Evidence from Break
下载PDF
导出
摘要 及物动词结构与非宾格动词结构的差异源于受事在句法结构中不同的句法位置。当致使动词表现为及物动词时,受事是在词根语类化后进行合并而形成的;当致使动词为非宾格时,受事是在词根语类化前,直接与词根合并。受事在各自结构合并的高低位置决定了致使动词的语义解读及特性差异。 The difference between the syntax of transitive verb and the syntax of unaccusative lies in the different syntactic positions of theme in relevant structures.It shows that with the transitive verb,the complement combines with an already categorized root while with the unaccusative,the complement combines with the root before it is categorized.The distinct syntactic position of theme determines the different interpretations and properties of causative verbs.
作者 唐清 TANG Qing(School of English Language Studies,Guangdong University of Foreign Studies,Guangzhou,Guangdong 510420,China;School of Foreign Language Studies,Hunan University of Science and Technology,Xiangtan,Hunan 411201,China)
出处 《宜宾学院学报》 2018年第7期111-118,共8页 Journal of Yibin University
基金 湖南省社科基金一般项目(14WLH13) 湖南省普通高校教育改革项目([2015]291号-272)
关键词 致使结构 及物动词结构 非宾格结构 合并 Causative structure transitive verb structure unaccusative structure combination
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献59

  • 1Adger, D. 2003. Core Syntax [M]. Oxford: OUP.
  • 2Beavers, J. & A. Koontz-Garboden. 2013. In defense of the reflexivization analysis of anti- causatives [J]. Lingua 131: 199-216.
  • 3Biberauer, T. & I. Roberts. 2010. Subjects, tense and verb-movement [A]. In T. Biberauer, A. Holmberg, I. Roberts & M. Sheehan (eds.). Parametric Variation: Null Subjects in Minimalist Theory [C]. Cambridge: CUP. 263-302.
  • 4Borer, H. 1984. Parametric Syntax [M]. Dordrecht: Foris.
  • 5Borer, H. 2005a. Structuring Sense. Volume 1. In Name Only [M]. Oxford: OUP.
  • 6Borer, H. 2005b. Structuring Sense. Volume 2. The Normal Course of Events [M]. Oxford: OUP.
  • 7Cheng, L. & R. Sybesma.1999. Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP [J]. Lin- guistic Inquiry 30: 509-542.
  • 8Chierchia, G. 2004. A semantics for unaccusatives and its syntactic consequences [A]. In A. Alexiadou, E. Anagnostopoulou & M. Everaert (eds.). The Unaccusativity Puzzle [C]. Oxford: OUP. 22-59.
  • 9Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. The Pisa Lectures [M]. Dor- drecht: Foris.
  • 10Chomsky, N. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework [A]. In R. Martin, D. Michaels, J. Uriagereka & S. Keyser (eds.). Step by Step:Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik [C]. Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press. 89-156.

共引文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部