摘要
针对"盗链"视频聚合行为的解决,现有的司法案例多以《著作权法》为审判依据。囿于《著作权法》制定之时的局限,无论理论界抑或实务界,在解释适用《著作权法》规制该类问题时,均无法统一观点进而形成具有说服力的结论,以有效保护权利人利益。究其根源在于模糊了《著作权法》与《反不正当竞争法》在保护知识产权权利及其财产利益上的边界,忽视了《反不正当竞争法》在保护知识产权上独具的敏锐性及适应性。新《反不正当竞争法》在视频聚合行为上作出的回应,昭示着《知识产权法》与《反不正当竞争法》体系性关系的新变革。
For the resolution of“hotlinking”video aggregation,the existing judicial cases mostly use Copyright Law as the basis for judgment.Concerning the limitations of Copyright Law,both the theoretical and practical circles could not unify their viewpoints and form convincing conclusions to effectively protect the interests of right holders when explaining the application of Copyright Law to regulate such issues.The cause lies in the blurring of the boundary between Copyright Law and Anti-unfair Competition Law in the protection of intellectual property rights and their property interests,and ignorance of the sensitivity and applicability of Anti-unfair Competition Law in the protection of intellectual property rights.The response of the new Anti-unfair Competition Law to the video aggregation shows that there is a new change in the systemic relationship between Intellectual Property Law and Anti-unfair Competition Law.
作者
李婉婷
LI Wanting(International Law School,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200333,China)
出处
《宜宾学院学报》
2018年第5期47-54,共8页
Journal of Yibin University
关键词
视频聚合
信息网络传播权
不正当竞争
Video aggregation
information network dissemination power
unfair competition