1Anessi- Pessina, E., G. Nasi, and I. Steccolini. 2008. Accounting Reforms: Determinants of Local Govern- ments' Choices. Financial Accountability and Management, 24 (3) : 321 -342.
2Coase, R. H. 1960. The Problem of Social Cost. Jour- nal of Law and Economics, 3 : 1 - 44.
3Jensen, M. C. 1983. Organization Theory and Methodol- ogy. The Accounting Review, 58 (2) : 319 -339.
4Jensen, M. C., and W. H. Meekling. 1976. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3 (4): 305 -360.
5Jones, R. 2012. Budgetary Accounting in National Gov- ernments: Anglo versus American Accounting. Financial Ac- countability and Management, 28 (3) : 286 - 305.
6Jones, R., E. Lande, K. Luder, and M. Portal. 2013. A Comparison of Budgeting and Accounting Reforms in the National Governments of France, Germany, the UK and the US. Financial Accountability and Management, 29 (4): 419 -441.
7Pina, V., L. Torres, and A. Yetano. 2009. Accrual Accounting in EU Local Governments: One Method, Several Approaches. European Accounting Review, 18 ( 4 ): 765 - 807.
8Potts, J. H. 1977. The Evolution of Budgetary Account- ing Theory and Practice in Municipal Accounting from 1870. Accounting Historians Journal, 4 ( 1 ) : 89 - 100.
9Roybark, H. M., E. N. Coffman, and G. J. Previts. 2012. The First Quarter Century of the GASB (1984 -2009) : A Perspective on Standard Setting (Part Two). Abacus, 48 (2): 147-198.
