摘要
因我国招标投标法律体系的"二法分立",招投标活动中的异议、质疑与询问就具有了不同的适用范围、流程及相关事项等,这就导致招投标活动中的相关当事人容易混淆异议、质疑与询问。本文从一个案例出发,辨析它们之间的关系,即:"异议"≠"质疑","质疑"≠"询问","异议"≠"询问"。同时指出,在工程建设项目招标投标法律体系中,并未规定"询问"事宜,为有效解决此"法律空白",寄希望于未来法律的修订与完善。
Due to the"two-way separation"of the legal system of tendering and bidding in our country,the objections,queries and inquiries in bidding activities have different scopes of application,processes and related issues,etc.,which leads to easy access to related parties in bidding activities.Confuse objections,queries and inquiries.This article starts from a case and discriminates the relationship between them:"objection","question","question","inquiry","objection","inquiry".At the same time,it pointed out that in the legal system of tendering and bidding for construction projects,there is no provision for“inquiry”matters.In order to effectively resolve this“legal blank”,hopefully the future law will be revised and improved.
作者
李金升
LI Jin-sheng(Guizhou Xinxin Law Firm,guiyang guizhou 550008)
出处
《招标与投标》
2018年第7期8-12,共5页
Tendering and Bidding
关键词
工程建设项目
政府采购项目
异议
质疑
询问
engineering construction project
government procurement project
objection
query
inquiry