1Alberts, B. (2011). Editorial expression of concern. Science, 334(6057), 760.
2American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
3Anderson, C. J., Bahnik,S., Bamett-Cowan, M., Boseo, F. A., Chandler, J., Chattier, C. R., .. Zuni, K. (2016). Response to comment on "Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science". Science. 351(6277L 1037.
4Asendorpf, J. B., Conner, M., De Fruyt, F., De Houwer, J., Denissen, J. J. A., Fiedler, K., .. Wicherts, J. M. (2013). Recommendations for Increasing replicability in psychology. European Journal of Personality, 27(2), 108-119.
5Bakan, D. (1966). The test of significance in psychological research. Psychological Bulletin, 66(6), 423-437.
6Baker, M. (2016). 1,500 scientists liR the lid on reproducibility. Nature, 553, 452-454.
7Bakker, M., van Dijk, A., & Wicherts, J. M. (2012). The rules of the game called psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 543-554.
8Barch, D. M., & Yarkoni, T. (2013). Introduction to the special issue on reliability and replication in cognitive and affective neurosciena research. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 13(4), 687-689.
9Begley, C. G., & Ellis, L. M. (2012). Drug development: Raise standards for preclinical cancer research. Nature, 483(7391), 531-533.
10Bem, D. J. (2011). Feeling the future: Experimental evidence for anomalous retroactive influences on cognition and affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(3), 407-425.
