期刊文献+

网络平台行为的垄断性研究——基于大数据的使用展开 被引量:11

Study on the Monopoly of Network Platform Behavior——Based on the Use of Big Data
下载PDF
导出
摘要 网络平台的崛起与数据的积累并货币化有密切的关联。由于网络效应的存在,数据产权界定不清晰,平台形成了大数据的竞争优势。与大数据有关的垄断案件也不断挑战着司法实践。以大数据为基础,网络平台可以实施排除和限制竞争的行为,如市场扩展、拒绝交易及数据驱动的收购等。这些行为对市场绩效、创新、消费者都可能产生负面的影响。对经营者实施的竞争行为应当进行反垄断审查,以保持市场的自由与开放。合理的确定数据权利有利于建立良好的竞争秩序。 The rise of the platform is closely related to the accumulation and monetization of data.Due to the existence of network effect,data property ownership is not clearly defined.The platform has formed the competitive advantage of big date.Monopoly cases related to big data are challenging judicial practices.Based on big data,platforms can implement behaviors that exclude and limit competition,such as market expansion,rejection of transactions refusal to deal and data-driven acquisitions.These actions can have a negative impact on market performance,innovation and consumers.Antitrust review should be conducted to keep the market free and open.Reasonable determination of data rights is conductive to establishing a good competitive order.
作者 贾晓燕 封延会 JIA Xiao-yan;FENG Yan-hui(Law School,Shandong University of Technology,Zibo Shangdong 255000,China)
出处 《科技与法律》 2018年第4期25-33,共9页 Science Technology and Law
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究规划青年项目"国有企业类型化改革与监管的法律体系重构"(14YJC820018) 山东省社会科学规划研究项目"大数据时代个人信息保护中的控制者责任研究"(17CHLJ08) 山东省法学会省级法学研究课题"大数据时代个人信息保护中的控制者责任研究"(SLS(2017)C20) 山东省法学会省级法学研究课题"大数据发展与个人信息保护模式:变迁与趋势"(SLS(2018)B10-3)
关键词 网络平台 数据权利 垄断 network platform data rights monopoly
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献61

  • 1《中华人民共和国商务部公告2009年第22号》,商务部2009年3月18日.
  • 2商务部办公厅.《商务部新闻发言人姚坚就可口可乐公司收购汇源公司反垄断审查决定答记者问》,2009年3月25日.
  • 3Herbert Hovenkamp, Federal Antitrust Policy: The Law of Competition and its Practice, Third Edition, West Publishing Co. , 2005, p. 321.
  • 4Herbert Hovenkamp, Antitrust, Second Edition, West Publishing Co., 1993, pp. 332-333.
  • 5United States v. Microsoft Corp. 1998 -2 Trade Cas. 72,261 (D. D. C. 1998), Cited from Eleanor M. Fox, Lawrence A. Sullivan and Ru- dolph J. R. Peritz, Cases and Materials on U. S. Antitrust in Global Context, West Publishing Co. , Second Edition, 2004, p. 256.
  • 6United States v. Microsoft Corp. 1998 -2 Trade Cas. 72,261 (D. D. C. 1998), Cited from Eleanor M. Fox, Lawrence A. Sullivan and Ru- dolph J. R. Peritz, Cases and Materials on U. S. Antitrust in Global Context, West Publishing Co. , Second Edition, 2004, 第256-257页.
  • 7Richard A. Posner, Vertical Restraints and Antitrust Policy, The University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 72, 2005, pp. 229 -441.
  • 8Louis Kaplow, Extension of Monopoly Power Through Leverage, Columbia Law Review, Vol. 85, 1985, pp. 515-556.
  • 9Feith N. Hylton, Antitrust Law: Economic Theory and Common Law Evolution, Cambridge University Press, 2003, pp. 196 -197.
  • 10Ward S. Browman, Jr. , Tying Arrangements and the Leverage Problem, Yale Law Journal, Vol. 67, 1957, pp. 19 -36.

共引文献39

同被引文献163

二级引证文献184

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部