期刊文献+

再论戴震《戴氏经考》与《毛诗补传》的关系

Re-exploration of the Relationship between Dai Shi Jing Kao and Mao Shi Bu Zhuan
下载PDF
导出
摘要 很多学者认为国家图书馆藏钞本《戴氏经考》就是沉睡了二百多年的戴震《毛诗补传》。经过考证发现:戴震并未说过《毛诗补传》已经成书,各家著作及书目著录依据是戴震作于乾隆十八年的《毛诗补传序》。《毛诗补传》与《戴氏经考》存在一定差距,没有充分的证据证明二者就是一部书。根据国家古籍著录规则,戴震《戴氏经考》著录为《戴氏诗经考》更为准确。 Many scholars believe that Dai Shi Jing Kao is Mao Shi Bu Zhuan which has not been discovered for more than 200 years.Based on textual research,we find that Daizhen has never mentioned that Mao Shi Bu Zhuan was finished.Many writings and bibliographies records are based on the preface of Mao Shi Bu Zhuan written by Daizhen in the eighteenth year of Qing Dynasty.The gap between Dai Shi Jing Kao and Mao Shi Bu Zhuan is large.Besides,there is no sufficient evidence to prove that the two books are the same book.According to the description rules of national ancient books,describing Dai Shi Jing Kao as Dai Shi Jing Kao is more accurate.
作者 刘晓丽 Liu Xiao-li
出处 《图书馆理论与实践》 CSSCI 2018年第7期87-91,共5页 Library Theory and Practice
关键词 戴震 《戴氏经考》 《毛诗补传》 Daizhen Dai Shi Jing Kao Mao Shi Bu Zhuan
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献19

  • 1汪世清.不疏园与皖派汉学[J].江淮论坛,1997(2):69-78. 被引量:9
  • 2杨应芹.关于《戴氏经考》即《毛诗补传》的考证[J].文献,1995(1):212-217. 被引量:2
  • 3.续修四库全书[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2002..
  • 4戴震.戴震文集[M].北京:中华书局,1980.
  • 5戴震.戴震全书[M].合肥:黄山书社,1997.
  • 6丛书集成续编[M].台北:台北新文丰出版公司,1991.
  • 7汪灼.四先生合传[C]//戴震全书:第七册.合肥:黄山书社,2010.
  • 8城南居士.城南居士后记[c]//戴震.戴震全集:第二卷.北京:清华大学出版社.1992.
  • 9王昶.戴东原先生墓志铭[C]∥戴震.戴震全集:第六卷.北京:清华大学出版社.1999.
  • 10洪榜.戴先生行状[c]//戴震.戴震全集:第六卷.北京:清华大学出版社.1999.

共引文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部