摘要
很多学者认为国家图书馆藏钞本《戴氏经考》就是沉睡了二百多年的戴震《毛诗补传》。经过考证发现:戴震并未说过《毛诗补传》已经成书,各家著作及书目著录依据是戴震作于乾隆十八年的《毛诗补传序》。《毛诗补传》与《戴氏经考》存在一定差距,没有充分的证据证明二者就是一部书。根据国家古籍著录规则,戴震《戴氏经考》著录为《戴氏诗经考》更为准确。
Many scholars believe that Dai Shi Jing Kao is Mao Shi Bu Zhuan which has not been discovered for more than 200 years.Based on textual research,we find that Daizhen has never mentioned that Mao Shi Bu Zhuan was finished.Many writings and bibliographies records are based on the preface of Mao Shi Bu Zhuan written by Daizhen in the eighteenth year of Qing Dynasty.The gap between Dai Shi Jing Kao and Mao Shi Bu Zhuan is large.Besides,there is no sufficient evidence to prove that the two books are the same book.According to the description rules of national ancient books,describing Dai Shi Jing Kao as Dai Shi Jing Kao is more accurate.
出处
《图书馆理论与实践》
CSSCI
2018年第7期87-91,共5页
Library Theory and Practice