期刊文献+

考虑出行者损失厌恶的后悔随机用户均衡模型 被引量:2

A Regret-based Stochastic User Equilibrium Model Considering Travelers' Loss Aversion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在经典随机后悔最小化模型的基础上,通过引入出行者获益损失的不对称偏好,建立了考虑出行者损失厌恶的属性水平的后悔函数及基于Logit形式的随机用户均衡模型.在提出的属性水平的后悔函数中,等尺度的获益和损失所产生的欣喜和后悔的差异,受后悔欣喜偏好参数和出行者损失厌恶共同影响.此外,与上述随机用户均衡模型等价的变分不等式问题被给出,并用相继平均法求解.最后,用1个算例网络来验证所提出模型的合理性和算法的可行性.结果表明,出行者的损失厌恶对其路径选择行为具有较大的影响,并且随着损失厌恶程度的增大,出行者更倾向于选择最短路径. Based on the classical random regret minimization model,this paper develops a new attribute level regret function by introducing travelers’loss aversion and proposes Logit-based stochastic user equilibrium model.In the proposed regret function,the difference between the regret generated by a loss and the rejoice generated by a gain with equal size is jointly affected by the taste parameter reflecting the relative importance of the regret and rejoice and loss aversion of travelers.In addition,the equivalent variational inequality problem of the proposed stochastic user equilibrium is given and the method of successive average is applied to solve it.Finally,a simple example network is used to prove the reasonability of the model and the feasibility of the algorithm.The results show that travelers’loss aversion has a great impact on route choice behavior.Moreover,travelers will be more inclined to choose the shortest route as the degree of the loss aversion increases.
作者 赵磊 关宏志 张新洁 赵鹏飞 ZHAO Lei;GUAN Hong-zhi;ZHANG Xin-jie;ZHAO Peng-fei(College of Architecture and Civil Engineering,Beijing University of Technology,Beijing 100124,China;Beijing Key Laboratory of Transportation Engineering,Beijing University of Technology,Beijing 100124,China)
出处 《交通运输系统工程与信息》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2018年第4期116-122,共7页 Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology
基金 国家自然科学基金(51338088 51378036)~~
关键词 城市交通 路径选择 后悔理论 损失厌恶 随机用户均衡 urban traffic route choice regret theory loss aversion stochastic user equilibrium
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献35

  • 1Vickrey W S. Congestion theory and transport investment [ J ]. American Economic ReView, 1969,3d :414-431.
  • 2Yang H, Huang H J. Analysis of the time-varying pricing of a bottleneck with elastic demand using optimal control theory [ J ]. Transportation Research Part B, 1997, 31 (6) : 425-440.
  • 3Arnott R, De Palma A, Lindsey R. Economics of a bottleneck[ J]. Journal of Urban Economics, 1990, 27(1) : 111-130.
  • 4Arnott R, De Palma A, Lindsey R. A structural model of peak-period congestion: a traffic bottleneck with elastic demand [ J]. American Economic Review, 1993, 83(1) : 161-179.
  • 5Laih C H. Queuing at a bottleneck with single and multi-step tolls [ J ]. Transportation Research Part A, 1994, 28(3) : 197-208.
  • 6Laih C H. Effects of the optimal step toll scheme on equilibrium commuter behavior [ J ]. Applied Economics, 2004, 36(1): 59-81.
  • 7Lindsey R, Van den Berg V, VerhoefE T. Step tolling with bottleneck queuing congestion [ J ]. Journal of Urban Economics, 2012, 72 : 46-59.
  • 8Rouwendal J, Verhoef E T, Knockaert J. Give or take? Rewards versus charges for a congested bottleneck [J]. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 2012, 42 : 166-176.
  • 9Senbil M, Kitamura R. Reference points in commuter departure time choice: a prospect theoretic test of alternative decision frames [ J ]. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2004, 8(1 ) : 19-31.
  • 10SenbilM, Kitamura R. Heterogeneity in commuter departure time decision: A prospect theoretic approach [ J]. International Series in Intelligent Technologies, 2005, 28: 369-398.

共引文献18

同被引文献11

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部