期刊文献+

基于碳限额-交易的供应链协调订货与定价模型 被引量:4

Supply chain coordinated ordering and pricing model based on cap-and-trade
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章研究了碳限额-交易机制下的两级供应链订货定价问题。建立了分散决策下的Stackelberg博弈模型,分析了碳限额-交易机制对供应链各方决策的影响;构建了集中决策下的供应链订货定价模型,通过比较发现,集中决策增加了供应链总利润;最后利用不对称Nash均衡模型,提出了供应链协作的激励机制。 Based on the cap-and-trade mechanism,the ordering and pricing model of the two-echelon supply chain is studied.Firstly,the Stackelberg game model under independent decision-making is established and the impacts of the cap-and-trade mechanism on the enterprises decisions are analyzed.Then the supply chain ordering and pricing model under centralized decision-making is set up,and it is found that the centralized decision-making increases the total profit of the supply chain.Finally,the incentive mechanism is put forward by using the asymmetric Nash negotiation model.
作者 赵明 张雁 胡小建 ZHAO Ming;ZHANG Yan;HU Xiaojian(School of Management,Hefei University of Technology,Hefei 230009,China;Dept.of Management Engineering,Anhui Communications Vocational and Technical College,Hefei 230051,China)
出处 《合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS 北大核心 2018年第8期1143-1148,共6页 Journal of Hefei University of Technology:Natural Science
基金 安徽省高等学校省级自然科学研究资助项目(KJ2013B072)
关键词 碳限额-交易 碳减排 STACKELBERG博弈 不对称Nash协商模型 cap-and-trade carbon reduction Stackelberg game asymmetric Nash negotiation model
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献140

  • 1周永务,杨萍.弹性需求下带有技术革新补贴的供应链协调[J].系统工程学报,2010,25(1):73-78. 被引量:6
  • 2李勇,张异,杨秀苔,但斌,朱淘.供应链中制造商-供应商合作研发博弈模型[J].系统工程学报,2005,20(1):12-18. 被引量:83
  • 3贾涛,徐渝.基于无缺陷退货的供应链成本补贴策略[J].运筹与管理,2007,16(1):131-136. 被引量:13
  • 4Oberthur S. , Ott, H. E.. The Kyoto Protocol:International Climate Policy for the 21st Century [M]. Berlin/ Heidelberg/New York, Springer, 1999.
  • 5香港环境保护署.2008空气污染管理(修订)条例草案[Z].香港,2008,http://www.legco.gov.hk/yr07-08/chinese/bills/brief/b26_brf.pdf.
  • 6魏一鸣,等.中国能源报告(2008):碳排放研究[M].北京:科学出版社,2008:134.
  • 7Monica, B. , Frabcesco, G.. Electricity pricing under "carbon emissions trading": A dominant firm with competitive fringe model [J]. Energy Policy, 2007, 35(8) : 4200-4220.
  • 8Kara, M. , et al. The impacts of EU CO2 emissions trading on electricity markets and electricity consumers in Finland [J]. Energy Economics, 2008, 30(2) : 193-211.
  • 9Tsikalakis, A.G., Hatziargyriou, N.D.. Environmental benefits of distributed generation with and without emissions trading [J]. Energy Policy, 2007, 35(6): 3395-3409.
  • 10Damien, D. , Philippe, Q.. European emission trading scheme and competitiveness: a case study on the iron and steel industry [J]. Energy Economics, 2007, 30 (4) : 2009-2027.

共引文献395

同被引文献23

引证文献4

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部