期刊文献+

面向复杂体系仿真系统的可信度评估指标构建方法 被引量:6

Methodology Used to Construct Credibility Assessment Index for Simulation System of Complex System of Systems
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对传统的单树状指标体系难以全面深入地表征可信度,尤其是体系内部系统之间的互操作关系,提出一种混合式的评估指标体系。首先建立一种共性的评估指标知识库,可在一定范围内根据不同的应用领域进行裁剪;在此基础上,从体系功能、运行效能、技术体制3方面构建多维度的评估指标体系主体,并基于仿真试验数据挖掘指标间的关联关系,构建该关联关系的可信度评估方法,最终结合两者形成动态网络化的指标体系。该混合式指标体系构建方法可为复杂体系仿真系统的可信度评估技术研究提供参考。 Since the traditional single tree index can not fully describe credibility of system of systems,especially when there are interoperation relationships within it,we have proposed a new hybrid index system construction methodology.We first establish a common evaluation index library,which within certain range,can be tailored according to the different application area.Using this as a base,we construct a multi-dimension assessment index system from the views of system function,operation effect and technique architecture.Based on simulation experiment data,we can mine the interoperation relationships among existing indexes,and construct a credibility assessment method for these relationships to establish the dynamic and networked index system.This hybrid index system construction methodology can build reference and support for research on credibility assessment for simulation system of complex system of systems.
作者 邓科 王小文 毛少杰 Deng Ke;Wang Xiaowen;Mao Shaojie(State Key Laboratory of Air Traffic Management System&Technology,Nanjing 210000,China)
出处 《兵工自动化》 2018年第8期51-55,77,共6页 Ordnance Industry Automation
基金 国家中央军委装备发展部仿真领域"十三五"预研项目的课题基金资助(4104010401)
关键词 体系 仿真系统 可信度评估 指标体系 system of systems simulation system credibility assessment index system
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献23

  • 1杨惠珍,康凤举,阎晋屯.一种基于AHP的仿真可信度评估方法研究[J].系统仿真学报,2006,18(z2):52-54. 被引量:17
  • 2张淑丽,叶满昌.导弹武器系统仿真可信度评估方法研究[J].计算机仿真,2006,23(5):48-52. 被引量:13
  • 3RABELO L, ESKANDARI H, SHALAN T, et al. Sup- porting simulation-based decision making with the use of AHP analysis [ C ]//Proceedings of Winter Simulation Conference. Orlando: Winter Simulation Conference, 2005:2042 - 2051.
  • 4XU D L. Application of multiple criteria decision analy-sis in impact assessment of carbon labelling[ C ]//Pro- ceedings of IEEE Industry Engineering & Engineering Management. Hong Kong: [ s. n. ], 2009:2251 - :2255.
  • 5CHEN Dingjun. Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation based on rough set [ C ] //Proceedings of 2009 sixth internation- al conference on fuzzy systems and knowledge discovery. Washington DC : IEEE Computer Society, 2009 : 91 - 93.
  • 6DONG Deng, LI Yijie. Application of rough set and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method in water quality assessment[ C]//2010 international conference on com- puting, control and industrial engineering. Washington DC : IEEE Computer Society, 2010 : 126 - 128.
  • 7QIN Xiaohui, ZHANG Jun. "Three-dimensional" fuzzy comprehensive evaluation and selection of the currency channel members [ C ]//International conference on transportation engineering 2007. Virgingia: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2007:3569 -3575.
  • 8BAI Hanbin, WANG Nuanchen. Research on the selec- tion of scale in AHP[ C]//Proceedings of 2010 3rd in- ternational conference on advanced computer theory and engineering (ICACTE). Chengdu: [ s. n. ], 2010: 108 - 111.
  • 9胡晓峰,张昱,杨镜宇.引人复杂网络和大数据方法实现武器装备体系能力评估的科学转变[C] .第六届“ 战争复杂性与信息化战争模拟” 学术研讨会.北京:国防大学出版社,2014:1-6.
  • 10David N.Reshef, Yakir A.Reshef,Hilarf K.Finucane. DetectingNovel Associations in Large Data Sets[J] Science,2 0 1 1 .1 1: 334(6062) : 1518-1524.

共引文献15

同被引文献33

引证文献6

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部