摘要
《遂初赋》篇名最早见于刘勰《文心雕龙》,文本则最早见于郦道元《水经注》引。至唐代,李善《文选注》有注引,《艺文类聚》有载录,而以《古文苑》收录文字最多。《水经注》《文选注》所引《遂初赋》多未见于《艺文类聚》,而皆见于《古文苑》。《艺文类聚》的载录不仅前后有删节,而且中间有大量省文;《古文苑》所录基本保存了原貌,但个别文字在传抄过程中有讹误。这一个案考察说明,《古文苑》收录的早期作品的可靠性不容轻易否定,其文献价值尚需重新审视。
The name of Suichu Prose is seen the earliest in Wenxin Diaolong written by Liu Xie,but the text is appeared the earliest in the introduction to Shuijingzhu written by Li Daoyuan.During the Tang Dynasty,Suichu Prose is cited in the notes and the introduction of Wenxuanzhu written by Li Shan,and quotes in Yiwen Leiju,however,Guwenyuan quotes words most.The parts of Suichu Prose quoted in Shuijingzhu and Wenxuanzhu are not seen in Yiwen Leiju but in Guwenyuan.The quotes in Yiwen Leiju have a lot of omissions.By comparison,the original records in Guwenyuan are basically preserved,but individual characters are corrupted in the process of copying.This case illustrates that the reliability of early texts quoted in Guwenyuan cannot be dismissed lightly and its literature value needs to be reviewed.
作者
龙文玲
LONG Wenling(College of Liberal Arts,Guangxi University,Nanning 530004,Guangxi,China)
出处
《铜仁学院学报》
2018年第7期31-36,52,共7页
Journal of Tongren University
基金
国家社会科学基金项目“西汉社会转型与文学演进”(12XZW2002)
