摘要
《国家知识产权战略纲要》颁布实施十年来,我国已建立了较完备的知识产权行政执法体系和执法辅助体系,行政执法程序和标准得到一定程度的完善,行政执法力度加强,行政执法的部门协作、跨地区协作和海关执法取得成效。从效果看,行政执法能力不断增强,但过于分散;权利得到有效保护,但处罚力度仍有欠缺;专项行动取得成效,但运动式执法存在弊端。未来应集中授权/登记机构,分离和加强行政执法机构,加强外贸知识产权监管机构和海关保护;进一步完善执法程序,统一执法标准,增强处罚力度,减少运动性执法;完善多元化救济途径的分工和配合,将行政部门的审批职能、行政执法职能、调解职能和一般行政管理职能相分离,同时扩大仲裁收案范围。
After the enforcement of the National IP Strategy Outline for almost 10 years,China already has an IP administrative enforcement system relatively complete and a supplementary enforcement system the administrative enforcement procedures and standards have been finished to some extent,the administrative enforcement has been strengthened,trans-department joint enforcement,trans-region joint enforcement and customs protection have achieved very good performance.As a result,the capability of executive organs are being continuously strengthened,but still too decentralized;IP rights are protected effectively and efficiently,but the punishment is still not so strong;special enforcement actions achieved good performance,but such movement-like enforcement has certain defects.It is suggested to centralize the granting/registering organs,separating the same with administrative enforcement organs,unifying and strengthening the latter,and strengthening organs for IP monitoring in foreign trade and the customs protection;improve enforcement procedures,uniform enforcement standards,strengthen administrative punishment,reduce movement-like enforcement;improve the division and co-operation among multiple relief routes,by separating exam/granting function,quasi-judicial function,mediation function and administrative function of executive organs,and broadening the IP right scope of customs protection.
作者
李春晖
LI Chun-hui(Law School,Peking University,Beijing 100871,China)
出处
《西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第5期64-74,共11页
Journal of Northwest University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition