摘要
本文提出汉语"N的V"结构中"V"发生了名词化且存在名化度的差异,并从句法、语义和语用相互关系、"鉴定格"和抽象名词的界定等方面加以论证。名词化不一定需要形态标志,汉语缺乏形态标识不能否定名词化。"V"受到副词修饰,不能证明"V"还是动词。根据"名化辖域"概念,此时发生名化的不是或不仅仅是"V",而是整个以"V"为核心的动词短语,即整个"VP"都得以"名化",呈现出名词性。"V"的名词化解决了向心结构难题。
This paper argues that“V”in the“N de V”construction has been nominalized with various degrees of nominalization,and exemplifies such argument from the interrelationships between syntax,semantics and pragmatics,“Identification Form”,and the definition of abstract noun.Nominalization doesn’t necessitate morphological variations.The fact that Chinese lacks morphology,can not deny nominalization.The fact that“V”can be modified by adverbs can’t prove that“V”remains as a verb.The reason is that according to“the domain of nominalization”,what is nominalized here is not just“V”but the whole verb phrase with“V”as the head,in other word the whole VP has been nominalized and displays the character of noun.The nominalization of“V”naturally solves the Endocentric paradox in Chinese.
出处
《现代语文》
2018年第7期4-9,共6页
Modern Chinese
关键词
“N的V”
名化
零形式
名化度
名化辖域
N de V
nominalization
zero form
degree of nominalization
nominalization domain.