期刊文献+

下属建言的影响机制:跨层次的调节中介检验 被引量:4

The Influence Mechanism of Subordinates' Voice: Examining a Multilevel Moderated Mediating Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用57位团队主管和303位下属配对追踪数据,探讨了教练型领导对建言行为跨层次影响的中介机制和边界条件。研究结果表明:(1)教练型领导显著正向影响下属的建言行为;(2)心理资本在教练型领导与建言行为间起中介作用;(3)共事时间对教练型领导与下属心理资本的正向关系有着显著强化作用;(4)教练型领导与共事时间的交互作用通过心理资本的中介作用,进而影响下属的建言行为。 The present study adopted a supervisor-subordinate-dyad sample of 303 employees and 57 team leaders from enterprises in Southern China,to examine the mediating mechanism and boundary condition of the cross-level influence of coaching leadership on employee voice behavior.The results showed that:(1)Coaching leadership was positively related to subordinates’voice behavior.(2)The subordinates’psychological capital mediated the relationship between coaching leadership and voice behavior.(3)The supervisor-subordinate dyadic tenure moderated the relationship between coaching leadership and subordinates’psychological capital.(4)The interaction between coaching leadership and supervisor-subordinate dyadic tenure influenced employee voice behavior through follower subordinates’psychological capital.
作者 王雁飞 袁楚芹 朱瑜 WANG Yan-fei;YUAN Chu-qin;ZHU Yu(School of Business Administration,South China University of Technology,Guangzhou 510640,China;School of Management,Jinan University,Guangzhou 510632,China)
出处 《应用心理学》 CSSCI 2018年第3期261-270,共10页 Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology
基金 国家自然科学基金(71772069 71602075) 教育部人文社会科学基金项目(15YJC630197 17YJA630101) 广东省自然科学基金重大培育项目(2017A030308013)资助
关键词 教练型领导 心理资本 建言行为 共事时间 coaching leadership psychological capital voice behavior supervisor-subordinate dyadic tenure
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献127

  • 1段锦云,钟建安.组织中的进谏行为[J].心理科学,2005,28(1):69-71. 被引量:99
  • 2谢章澍,杨志蓉.创新共同体:企业全员创新模式的新探索[J].科学学研究,2006,24(5):775-779. 被引量:25
  • 3王雁飞,朱瑜.心理资本理论与相关研究进展[J].外国经济与管理,2007,29(5):32-39. 被引量:278
  • 4Burris,E.R.,Detert,J.R.,& Romney,A.C.(2013).Speaking up vs.being heard:The disagreement around and outcomes of employee voice.Organization Science,24 (1),22-38.
  • 5Demerouti,E.,Bakker,A.B.,de Jonge,J.,Janssen,P.P.,& Schaufeli,W.B.(2001).Burnout and engagement at work as a function of demands and control.Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment and Health,27,279-286.
  • 6Detert,J.R.,& Burris,E.R.(2007).Leadership behavior and employee voice:Is the door really open? Academy of Management Journal,50 (4),869-884.
  • 7Edwards,J.R.,& Lambert,L.S.(2008).Methods for integrating moderation and mediation:A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis.Psychological Methods,12,1-22.
  • 8May,D.R.,Gilson,R.L.,& Harter,L.M.(2008).The psychological conditions of meaningfulness,safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work.Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology,77,11-37.
  • 9Martin,M.M.,& Anderson,C.M.(1998).The cognitive flexibility scale:Three validity studies.Communication Reports,11,1-9.
  • 10Martin,M.M.,& Anderson,C.M.(2001).The relationship between cognitive flexibility and affinity-seeking strategies.Advances in Psychological Research,4,69-76.

共引文献244

同被引文献57

引证文献4

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部