期刊文献+

论维特根斯坦哲学思想的突破及其所带来的启示 被引量:1

On the Breakthrough of Wittgenstein’s Philosophy and Its Enlightenment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 维特根斯坦的哲学理念体现了对传统哲学观的挑战,维特根斯坦不但从宏观层面上而且从微观层面上突破了传统的哲学观念。宏观层面上挑战了传统的哲学使命观等,微观层面上涉及了逻辑、精确性、意愿等问题的讨论。维特根斯坦在“同一”问题和新兴的“人工智能”问题上和以往的观念有着本质的区别,并且在这两方面有精彩的论述。维特根斯坦的哲学理念总是具有颠覆性的,他的观点深刻且有见地,同时维特根斯坦的哲学理念也给哲学研究视角的改变带来了启示。 Wittgenstein's philosophy ideas embody the challenge to the traditional philosophy.Wittgenstein broke through the traditional philosophy not only from the macro level,but also from the micro level.On the macro level,the tradi?tional philosophy of mission is challenged,and the micro level involves the discussion of logic,accuracy,will and so on.Wittgenstein is essentially different from previous concepts in the identical issue and the emerging AI problem,and propos?es brilliant discussions in these two aspects.Wittgenstein's philosophy is always subversive,his views are profound and in?sightful,and Wittgenstein's philosophy also brings inspiration to the change of philosophical research perspective.
作者 方俊奇 FANG Jun-qi(School of Humanities,Shanghai Jiao Tong University,Shanghai 200240,China)
出处 《江科学术研究》 2018年第3期85-90,共6页 Academic Research Of JXUT
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目“当代知识论的系列研究”(NO.14ZDB012)
关键词 维特根斯坦 哲学 “同一” 人工智能 启示 Wittgenstein Philosophy“ Identical” Artificial intelligence(AI) Enlightenment
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献47

  • 1尹鑫,罗曼予.维特根斯坦“遵从规则”悖论及方法论启示[J].广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2007,43(2):6-9. 被引量:2
  • 2Ban'esi, J. 1987. Prospects for the Cyberiad: Certain limits on human self-knowledge in the cybernetic age. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior. 1: 19-46.
  • 3博登2006.《人工智能哲学》.刘西瑞、王汉琦译.上海译文出版社.
  • 4Colby, K., Hilf, F., Weber, S., and Kraemer, H. 1972. Turing-like Indistinguishability Tests for the Validation of a Computer Simulation of Paranoid Processes. Artif. Inte11. 3 (1-3): 199-221.
  • 5Copeland, J. 2000. The Turing Test. Minds and Machines. 10: 519-539.
  • 6Carleton, L 1984. Programs, Language Understanding and Searle. Synthese. 59.
  • 7Dennett, D. 1985. Can machines think? in: M. Shafto (ed.). How We Know. San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row. 121-145.
  • 8Epstein, R., Roberts, G. and Beber, G. 2009. Parsing the Turing Test: Philosophical and Methodological Issues in the Quest for the Thinlo'ng Computer. Springer.
  • 9French, R. 1990. Subcognition and the Limits of the Turing Test. Mind. 99:53-65 (repr. In Millican and Clark 1996).
  • 10French, R. 2000. The Turing Test: the First 50 Years. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 4:115-122.

共引文献29

同被引文献2

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部