期刊文献+

复杂信息系统界面可用性指标体系研究 被引量:14

On the Usability Evaluation Index System of Complex Information System Interface
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着复杂信息系统在军事领域和民用领域的广泛应用及不断发展,人们对复杂信息系统显示界面的设计有了更高层面的要求。通过可用性评估指导复杂信息系统界面设计改良,降低系统复杂性带给用户的工作认知负荷,提高用户绩效成为亟待解决的问题。针对复杂信息系统界面进行了研究,从界面特征、任务特征、认知特征进行了分析,提出了界面复杂性的影响因素,构建了复杂度评估指标体系,采用层次分析法针对界面的复杂性的指标权重进行了研究,并根据构建的复杂度模型提出了相应的可用性指标体系。 With the rapid development and extensive use of complex information system on both military and civil field,design of the display interface of complex information system needs to be improved to a higher level.The usability evaluation can be used to guide the improvement of the interface design of complex information system,which can reduce the workload of users induced by the complexity of system,and also improve the performance of users.This has already become a problem demanding prompt solution.This paper researched on the complex information system interface and analyzed from the features of interface,task and cognition,after which,the influence factors of interface complexity were put forward,the index system of complexity evaluation was constructed and the index weight of the complexity of interface was studied by AHP,and in the end,the corresponding usability index system was put forward according to the complexity model.
作者 赵欣 丁怡 侯文军 陈筱琳 ZHAO Xin;DING Yi;HOU Wenjun;CHEN Xiaolin(China Academic of Electronics and Information Technology,Beijing 100041,China;School of Digital Media&Design Arts,Beijing University of Post and Telecommunications,Beijing 100876,China)
出处 《图学学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2018年第4期716-722,共7页 Journal of Graphics
关键词 复杂信息系统 可用性 层次分析法 指标体系 complete information system usability analytic hierarchy process index system
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献24

  • 1赵丹华,赵江洪.汽车造型特征与特征线[J].包装工程,2007,28(3):115-117. 被引量:85
  • 2McCall JA, Richards PK, Waiters GF. Factors in Soft- ware Quality. Volume I. Concepts and Definitions of Software Quality[ R], Information Service, Springfield, Va. ,1977.
  • 3Van Welie M, Van Der Veer GC, Elins A. Breaking Down Usability[ C ], In: Proceedings of INTERACT, Amsterdam,The Netherlands, 1999:613 - 620.
  • 4Saffeh A, Kececi N, Donyaee M. QUIM : A Framework for Quantifying Usability Metrics in Software Quality Models [ C ]. In : APAQS 2001 : Second Asia - Pacific Conference on Quality Software, Hong - Kong, 2001 : 311 -318.
  • 5Han SH ,un MH, Kim KJ, et al. Evaluation of Product Usability:Development and Validation of Usability Di- mensions and Design Elements Based on Empirical Models [ J ]. International Journal of Industrial Ergo- nomics,2000,26 (4) :477 - 488.
  • 6Hart SH, Yun MH, Kwahk J, et al. Usability of Con- sumer Electronic Products [ J ]. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics,2001,28 (3 -4) :143 - 151.
  • 7Kwahk J, Han SH. A Methodology for Evaluating the Usability of Audiovisual Consumer Electronic Products [ J ]. Applied Ergonomics ,2002,33 (5) :419 - 431.
  • 8Beom Suk Jin, Yong Gu Ji, Kyeyoun Choi, et al. Devel- opment of A Usability Evaluation Frameworkwith Qual- ity Function Deployment:From Customer Sensibility to Product Design [ J ]. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing,2009,19 (2) : 177 - 194.
  • 9Tullis T, Albert B. Measuring the User Experience [ M ]. Elsevier Inc. 2008.
  • 10Sauro J, Lewis JR. Correlations among Prototypical Us- ability Metrics:Evidence for the Construct of Usability [ C ] , In CHI 2009 : Proceedings of the 27th Interna- tional Conference on Human Factors in Computing Sys- tems , ACM New York, NY, USA 2009 : 1609 - 1618.

共引文献19

同被引文献153

引证文献14

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部