期刊文献+

地佐辛对小儿耳鼻喉手术全身麻醉苏醒期躁动的影响分析 被引量:1

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨地佐辛对小儿耳鼻喉手术全身麻醉苏醒期躁动的影响。方法:回顾2016年1月-2017年9月84例小儿耳鼻喉手术全身麻醉患儿并分组。对照组采用全身麻醉,地佐辛组则在对照组基础上给予地佐辛预防全身麻醉苏醒期躁动。比较两组耳鼻喉手术全身麻醉患效果;耳鼻喉手术后苏醒时间、平均拔管时间、拔管5分钟之后呼吸频率;苏醒时、苏醒后15分钟和苏醒后半小时患儿躁动评分;麻醉不良反应发生率;苏醒期躁动发生率。结果:地佐辛组耳鼻喉手术全身麻醉患儿效果和对照组无显著差异,P>0.05;地佐辛组耳鼻喉手术后苏醒时间、平均拔管时间、拔管5分钟之后呼吸频率和对照组无显著差异,P>0.05;苏醒时、苏醒后15分钟和苏醒后半小时患儿躁动评分地佐辛组躁动评分优于对照组,P<0.05。拔管半小时以内,地佐辛组有1例发生恶心,有1例发生头晕和1例呕吐,发生率是7.14%,对照组有1例发生恶心,有1例发生头晕和1例呕吐,发生率是7.14%,地佐辛组和对照组无显著差异,P>0.05;地佐辛组苏醒期躁动发生率14.29%(有6例出现躁动)显著低于对照组50.00%(有21例出现躁动),P<0.05。结论:地佐辛对小儿耳鼻喉手术全身麻醉苏醒期躁动有明显的预防作用,可有效减少躁动发生,且不良反应轻微,安全性高,患儿耐受性良好,不影响术后苏醒、拔管和呼吸,值得推广和应用。
出处 《湖南中医药大学学报》 CAS 2018年第A01期426-426,共1页 Journal of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献68

  • 1邓敏,杨鑫,何丽.地佐辛预防小儿眼科手术全身麻醉苏醒期躁动的临床观察[J].云南医药,2013,34(3):230-232. 被引量:1
  • 2Li X, Xia Q, Li W. Comparison of the effects of dezocine, fent- anyl, and placebo on emergence agitation after sevoflurane an- esthesia in children [J]. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther, 2015, 53 (3) :241 -246.
  • 3Messieha Z. Prevention of sevoflurane delirium and agitation with propofol [J]. AnesthProg, 2013, 60(2):67-71.
  • 4Use T, Nakahara H, Kimoto A, et al. Barbiturate Induction for the Prevention of Emergence Agitation after Pediatric Sevoflurane Anesthesia [J]. J Pediatr Pharmaeol Ther, 2015, 20(5) : 385-392.
  • 5Gupta P, Rath GP, Prabhakar H, et al. Comparison between sevoflurane and desflurane on emergence and recovery charac- teristics of children undergoing surgery for spinal dysraphism [J]. IndianJ Anaesth, 2015, 59(8): 482-487.
  • 6Hauber JA, Davis PJ, Bendel LP, et al. Dexmedetomidine as a Rapid Bolus for Treatment and Prophylactic Prevention of EmergenceAgitation in Anesthetized Children [J]. Anesth Analg, 2015, 121(5): 1308-1315.
  • 7Polar R, Pekcr K, Baran I, et al. Comparison between dexme detomidine and remifentanil infusion in emergence agitation dur- ing recovery after nasal surgery: A randomized double-blind tri- al[J]. Anaesthesist, 2015, 64(10):740 -746.
  • 8Van Hoff SL, O'Neill ES, Cohen LC, et al. Does a prophylactic dose of propofol reduce emergence agitation in children receiving anesthesia? A systematic review and recta-analysis [J]. Paedi- atr Anaesth, 2015, 25(7): 668-676.
  • 9Kim HJ, Kim DK, Kim HY, et al. Risk factors of emergence agitation in adults undergoing general anesthesia for nasal sur- gery I-iT. Clin Exo Otorhinolarvnlzol, 2015, 8(1) :46-51.
  • 10Saxena A, Sethi A, Agarwal V, et al. Effect of caudal cloni dine on emergence agitation and postoperative analgesia after sevoflurane anaesthesia in children: Randomised comparison of two doses[J]. IndianJ Anaesth, 2014, 58(6):719-725.

共引文献65

同被引文献11

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部