期刊文献+

达芬奇机器人在食管癌根治术中学习曲线的研究 被引量:10

The learning curve of Da Vinci robotic surgical system for radical surgery in esophageal cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的目前关于达芬奇机器人系统用于食管癌手术治疗的学习曲线研究较少。文中旨在评估达芬奇机器人手术系统在实施食管癌根治手术的临床效果,探讨胸外科医师达芬奇机器人手术系统学习曲线特征。方法回顾性分析2011年1月至2015年12月南京军区南京总医院心胸外科连续开展达芬奇机器人60例食管癌切除患者的临床资料。按手术开展时间的先后顺序分为A组(手术时间2011年1月至2013年1月)、B组(手术时间2013年2月至2014年2月)、C组(手术时间2014年3月至2015年12月),每组20例。比较各组机器人安装时间、胸腔腹腔游离时间、总手术时间及并发症等,分析机器人手术系统学习曲线。结果 60例患者手术均顺利完成,无中转开胸、开腹。3组并发症发病率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。随着手术例数的增加,A组、B组、C组总手术时间[(450.7±99.1)、(299.7±57.1)、(248.5±71.5)min]逐步缩短,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。经学习曲线分析结果显示,A组20例装机时间、胸腹腔游离时间及总手术时间明显长于B组、C组,在20例时拟合曲线出现转角,之后曲线开始渐缓。综合总手术时间、胸腹腔游离时间及装机时间可见机器人食管癌根治术学习曲线为20例。结论胸外科医师经过20例的学习,可掌握达芬奇机器人手术系统用于食管癌根治手术。 Objective At present,there are few studies about the learning curve of da Vinci robot system for surgical treatment of esophageal cancer.This study aimed to evaluate the surgical outcomes of Da Vinci robotic surgical system for radical surgery in esophageal cancer and explore the learning curve characteristics of thoracic surgeon. Methods Clinical data of 60 consecutive cases who received Da Vinci robot-assisted radical esophagectomy between January 2011 and December 2015 in Nanjing General Hospital were reviewed retrospectively.The cases were divided into 3 groups according to the operation period:group A(operation time:January 2011 to January 2013),group B(operation time:February 2013 to February 2014)and group C(operation time:March 2014 to December 2015).There were 20 cases in each group.The docking time,thoracic cavity anatomical separation time,total operation time and complication were compared.The learning curve of robotic surgery system were analyzed Results The operations of 60 patients were successfully completed without any transfer to thoracotomy or laparotomy.There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of complications between the 3 groups(P>0.05).With the increase in the number of surgical cases,the total operation time of group A([450.7±99.1]min),group B([299.7±57.1]min)and group C([248.5±71.5]min)was gradually reduced.The difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The robotic docking time,thoracic cavity anatomical separation time in group A was significantly longer than that in group B and C(P<0.05),and there was no significant difference between group B and group C(P>0.05).There were significant differences in total operation time among the three groups(P<0.05).After 20 cases,the fitting curve appeared turning angle,and then the curve began to slow down.Combined with the total operation time,pleural and abdominal cavity anatomical separation time and robotic docking time,it can be seen that the learning curve of Da Vinci robot-assisted radical robotic surgery in esophageal cancer was 20 cases. Conclusion After 20 cases of study,the thoracic surgeon can master the Da Vinci robotic surgical system for the radical surgery of esophageal cancer.
作者 刘小龙 熊磊 丛壮壮 李德闽 申翼 易俊 LIU Xiao-long;XIONG Lei;CONG Zhuang-zhuang;LI De-min;SHEN Yi;YI Jun(Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery,Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Region,PLA,Nanjing 210002,Jiangsu,China)
出处 《医学研究生学报》 CAS 北大核心 2018年第8期831-834,共4页 Journal of Medical Postgraduates
基金 江苏省自然科学基金(BK20161387)
关键词 食管癌 学习曲线 达芬奇机器人 胸外科 esophageal cancer learning curve Da Vinci robotic surgical system thoracic surgery
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献41

  • 1Jean-Louis Dulucq,Pascal Wintringer,Ahmad Mahajna.Totally laparoscopic trans-hiatal gastroesophagectomy for benign diseases of the esophago-gastric junction[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2007,13(2):285-288. 被引量:5
  • 2Pandey R,Garg R,Chandralekha,et al.Robot-assisted thoraco-scopic thymectomy:Perianaesthetic concernsEur J Anaes-thesiol,2010.
  • 3Limmer KK,Kernstine KH.Minimally invasive and robotic-as-sisted thymus resectionThoracic Surgery Clinics,2011.
  • 4Ruckert JC,Swierzy M,Ismail M.Comparison of robotic andnonrobotic thoracoscopic thymectomy:Acohort studyJournal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery,2011.
  • 5Kim DJ,Hyung WJ,Lee CY,et al.Thoracoscopic esophagecto-my for esophageal cancer:Feasibility and safety of robotic assis-tance in the prone positionJournal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery,2010.
  • 6Sivarajah M,Weksler B.Robotic-assisted resection of a thymomaafter two previous sternotomiesThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery,2010.
  • 7Giulianotti PC,Buchs NC,Caravaglios G,et al.Robot-assistedlung resection:outcomes and technical detailsInteract Card-iovasc Thorac Surg,2010.
  • 8Augustin F,Bodner J,Wykypiel H,et al.Initial experiencewith robotic lung lobectomy:Report of two different approachesSurgical Endoscopy,2011.
  • 9Swanson SJ.Robotic pulmonary lobectomy-the future and proba-bly should remain soJournal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery,2010.
  • 10Rodriguez E,Chitwood WR.Robotics in cardiac surgeryScand J Surg,2009.

共引文献45

同被引文献81

引证文献10

二级引证文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部