期刊文献+

双水平正压通气在早产儿呼吸支持中的应用进展 被引量:8

Application of biphasic positive airway pressure ventilation for respiratory support in preterm infant
下载PDF
导出
摘要 机械通气的应用虽然提高了早产儿的存活率,但也增加了支气管肺发育不良和不良神经发育结局的风险。近年来,双水平正压通气(BiPAP)作为一种较新的无创通气模式,越来越多的应用于早产儿的呼吸支持。由于BiPAP交替提供两个压力水平,且两个压力相均允许自主呼吸,因此能更好的改善气体交换,提高氧合,在早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征和呼吸暂停等疾病中的作用优于持续气道正压通气(CPAP)。文章阐述BiPAP的工作原理,评价其在早产儿呼吸支持中的应用,为临床推广使用提供依据。 Although mechanical ventilation improves the survival rate of preterm infants,it also increases the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia and adverse neurodevelopmental outcome.In recent years,biphasic positive airway pressure ventilation(BiPAP)is a new non-invasive ventilation mode and has been applied more and more to the respiratory support of premature infants.Since BiPAP provides two pressure levels alternately and two pressure phases allow breathing autonomously,it is better to improve gas exchange and improve oxygenation and thus is better than continuous positive airway pressure(CPAP)in premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome and apnea.This article describes the working principle of BiPAP and its application in respiratory support of premature infants,so as to provide evidence for its promotion and wide application in clinic.
作者 马力 杨海波 温晓红 MA Li;YANG Haibo;WEN Xiaohong(The First People’s Hospital of Hefei,Hefei 230031,Anhui,China)
出处 《临床儿科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2018年第9期707-710,共4页 Journal of Clinical Pediatrics
基金 安徽省科技攻关项目(No.1604a0802093)
关键词 双水平正压通气 无创通气 呼吸支持 早产儿 biphasic positive airway pressure non-invasive ventilation respiratory support premature
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献36

  • 1邵肖梅,叶鸿瑁,丘小汕.实用新生儿学.第4版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2011.
  • 2邵肖梅,叶鸿瑁,丘小汕.实用新生儿学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2011.347.
  • 3Verder H, Bohlin K, Kamper J, et al. Nasal CPAP and surfactant for treatment of respiratory distress syndrome and prevention of bronchopul- monary dysplasia [ J ]. Acta Paediatr ,2009 ,98 (9) : 1400 - 1408.
  • 4Ammari A, Suri M, Milisavljevic V, et al. Variables associated with the early failure of nasal CPAP in very low birth weight infants [ J ]. J Pe- diatr,2005,147 (3) :341 - 347.
  • 5Meneses J, Bhandari V, Alves JG, et al. Noninvasive ventilation for re- spiratory distress syndrome : A randomized controlled trial [ J ]. Pedia- tr/cs,2011,127(2) :300 -307.
  • 6Sai Sunil Kishore M, Dutta S, Kumar P. Early nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus continuous positive airway pressure for respi- ratory distress syndrome [ J ]. Acta Paediatr ,2009 ,98 (9) : 1412 - 1415.
  • 7Kugelman A, Feferkom I, Riskin A, et al. Nasal intermittent mandatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure for respirato- ry distress syndrome : A randomized, controlled, prospective study [ J ]. J Pediatr,2007,150 (5) :521 - 526.
  • 8Kugelman A, Durand M. A comprehensive approach to the prevention of bronchopulmonary dysplasia [ J ]. Pediatr Pulmonol, 2011,46 ( 12 ) : 1153 - 1165.
  • 9Pelligra G, Abdellatif MA, Lee SK. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure and outcomes in preterm infants: A retrospective analysis [ J ]. Paediatr Child Health ,2008,13 ( 2 ) :99 - 103.
  • 10Kumar M, Avasthi S, Ahuja S, et al. Unsynchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation to prevent extubation failure in neonates: A randomized controlled trial[ J]. Indian J Pediatr, 2011,78 (7) :801 - 806.

共引文献46

同被引文献82

引证文献8

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部