国际商事法庭:制度比较、规则冲突与构建路径

International Commercial Court: Institutional Comparison,Conflict of Rules and Construction Path

过去十余年来,国际商事纠纷司法裁判机构方兴未艾,成为国际商业与司法竞争的重要表现形式和工具。在现有此类机构中,新加坡国际商事法院的发展尤为引人注目,其相关制度对我国具有较大借鉴意义。我国国际商事法庭若对标国际通行做法,可能会在管辖权、法官构成、工作语言、适用法律、审理程序、出庭律师、判决执行等方面与现有法律制度产生冲突。对此,可以通过全国人大常委会授权的方式予以解决。我国国际商事法庭在立足于"一带一路"倡议的同时,还应以开放的姿态和灵活的安排来处理国际商事纠纷解决申请,充分发挥自身综合诉讼与仲裁特点的独特优势。

The past decade has witnessed the rise of international commercial courts,which have become an important manifestation and instrument of international commercial and judicial competition.The success of Singapore International Commercial Court in particular is impressive and has significant implications for China.By comparing China’s commercial court with the existing international commercial courts,conflicts may rise in the issues involved in these courts,such as jurisdiction,composition of bench,language used in hearing and trial procedures,governing laws chose by the parties concerned,trial procedures,lawyers appearing in court and enforcement of judgments.Those possible conflicts can be solved through the authorization of the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congressn.While basing itself on the“Belt and Road”initiative,China’s international commercial court should inclusively accept applications for international commercial dispute resolution with an open and flexible system,and give full play to the unique advantages of its litigation and arbitration features.