期刊文献+

海绵城市建设项目运作模式浅析 被引量:1

Analysis on Operation Modell of sponge City Construction Project
下载PDF
导出
摘要 海绵城市建设在我国处于起步阶段,其项目运作模式也较为灵活,可以基于传统的工程建设模式与主体工程同步建设,也可以采用目前国家大力推广的PPP模式以及联合开发模式,或交由城市运营商建设运维。文章重点介绍了海绵城市项目采用三种模式建设的运作过程、特点、优势以及适用性分析,希望对现阶段海绵城市试点建设能起到一定的指导和借鉴意义。 Sponge City construction is at the initial stage in China,and its project operation model is relatively flexible.It can be built synchronously with the main project based on the traditional project construction model,or it can also adopt the PPP model vigorously promoted by the state,as well as the joint development model,or be built and maintained by the urban operators.This paper mainly introduces the operation process,characteristics,advantages and applicability analysis of Sponge City project with three models of construction,and hopes to provide some guidance and reference for the pilot construction of Sponge City at the present stage.
作者 张毅 刘玉娇 Zhang Yi;Liu Yujiao(ShenZhen Huakong Seg Co.,Ltd.Beijing Branch,Beijing 100083;China Eco-city Academy Co.,Ltd.,Beijing 100044)
出处 《建设科技》 2018年第14期78-82,共5页 Construction Science and Technology
关键词 海绵城市 运作模式 优势 Sponge City operation model advantage
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献60

  • 1丁成日.空间结构与城市竞争力[J].地理学报,2004,59(z1):85-92. 被引量:38
  • 2张明,刘菁.适合中国城市特征的TOD规划设计原则[J].城市规划学刊,2007(1):91-96. 被引量:92
  • 3张红,马进军,朱宏亮.城市轨道交通对沿线住宅项目价格的影响[J].北京交通大学学报,2007,31(3):10-13. 被引量:28
  • 4Alonso, W. , 1964, "Location and Land Use," Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • 5Anderson, J.E. , 1985, "On testing the convexity of hedonic price functions," Journal of Urban Economics, 18,334-337.
  • 6Aurelia, Bengochea-Morancho, 2003, "A hedonic valuation of urban green areas," Landscape and Urban Planning, 66, 35.41.
  • 7Benjamin, J.D. and G. S. Sirmans, 1996, "Mass Transportation, Apartment Rent and Property Values," Journal of Real Estate Research, 12(1), 1-8.
  • 8Benson, E. D., J. L. Hansen, A. L. Schwartz and G. T. Smersh, 1998, “Pricing Residential Amenities: the Value of a View,” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 16(1), 55-73.
  • 9Black, S. E. , 1999, "Do Better Schools Matter? Parental Valuation of Elementary Education," Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(2), 577-599.
  • 10Brasington, M. and Diane Hite, 2005, “Demand for Environmental Quality: a Spatial Hedonic Analysis,” Regional Science and Urban Economics, 35, 57-82.

同被引文献3

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部