期刊文献+

Analysis of the Frequency Domain Water-level Deconvolution Method Based on Reservoir Airgun Source Data

Analysis of the Frequency Domain Water-level Deconvolution Method Based on Reservoir Airgun Source Data
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Based on the 2016 airgun experimental data of the Fujian Nanyi reservoir,we adopted the frequency domain water-level deconvolution method and cross-correlation time delay detection technique to study the influence of level scaling factor and the background noise level of the station on deconvolution calculation results, and analyze the effect of deconvolution on eliminating the influence of the source caused by different air-gun pressures. The results show that:( 1) When the level scaling factor is smaller,the signal to noise ratio of the waveform after the deconvolution is smaller,and when the level scaling factor is over smaller,the identification error of travel time is greater.( 2) When the SNR of the station record is higher,the recognition accuracy of travel time is higher,the influence of SNR on the reference station record is far greater than the far station,when the SNR of the far station record is more than 10,the error of travel time is within6 ms,but when the SNR of the reference station record is 30,the travel time error may reach to 20 ms.( 3) When the airgun source difference is big,the frequency domain waterlevel deconvolution method has better effect on eliminating the source influence,but the method error may be introduced when the source difference is small. Based on the 2016 airgun experimental data of the Fujian Nanyi reservoir,we adopted the frequency domain water-level deconvolution method and cross-correlation time delay detection technique to study the influence of level scaling factor and the background noise level of the station on deconvolution calculation results, and analyze the effect of deconvolution on eliminating the influence of the source caused by different air-gun pressures. The results show that:( 1) When the level scaling factor is smaller,the signal to noise ratio of the waveform after the deconvolution is smaller,and when the level scaling factor is over smaller,the identification error of travel time is greater.( 2) When the SNR of the station record is higher,the recognition accuracy of travel time is higher,the influence of SNR on the reference station record is far greater than the far station,when the SNR of the far station record is more than 10,the error of travel time is within6 ms,but when the SNR of the reference station record is 30,the travel time error may reach to 20 ms.( 3) When the airgun source difference is big,the frequency domain waterlevel deconvolution method has better effect on eliminating the source influence,but the method error may be introduced when the source difference is small.
出处 《Earthquake Research in China》 CSCD 2018年第3期355-366,共12页 中国地震研究(英文版)
基金 “Analysis of Accuracyof Airgun Source in Monitoring Crustal Media Change and Its Influence Factors”,the National Natural Science Foundation of China(41774068) and Special Fund for Science and Technology,Fujian Earthquake Agency(SF201709)
关键词 Large volume airgun WATER-LEVEL DECONVOLUTION in frequency DOMAIN CROSS-CORRELATION time DELAY Green s function Large volume airgun Water-level deconvolution in frequency domain Cross-correlation time delay Green's function
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献65

共引文献81

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部