期刊文献+

推理判断中双重加工过程的协作与转换机制 被引量:14

The cooperation and transformation mechanism of dual processing in reasoning and judgment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 推理判断中双重加工理论的发展经历了不同发展阶段,早期主要对两个加工过程的定义及特征的关注,当前转向对两者间的协作及转换机制的研究。本研究梳理了双重加工过程协作及转换机制的代表性模型及其相关实验支持证据,综合归纳为以下三类模型:序列加工模型(Serialprocessingmodel)、平行竞争模型(Parallelcompetitivemodel)以及混合模型(Hybridmodel),并比较和论述了三类模型在两个加工过程的转换和协作机制、冲突探查的加工机制、偏差反应的解释机制上的异同,以及三类模型各自面临的问题。 Theories about dual processing in reasoning and judgment have gone through different stages of development,and the focus on the definition and characteristics of the two processing processes in the early stage has turned to the study of the cooperation and transformation mechanism between the two at present.This study sorts out the representative models of the collaboration and transformation mechanism and its related experimental support evidence in the dual processing process,and summarizes the following three models:serial processing model,parallel competitive model and hybrid model.This study proceeds to compare and discuss the problems faced by the three models respectively as well as the differences and similarities between the three models in their interpretations of the transformation and cooperation mechanism between the two processing processes,the processing mechanism of conflict detection,and bias response.
作者 艾炎 胡竹菁 AI Yan;HU Zhujing(School of Psychology,Jiangxi Normal University,Nanchang 330022,China)
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2018年第10期1794-1806,共13页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(31460252)资助
关键词 双重加工 序列加工模型 平行竞争加工模型 混合加工模型 dual processing serial processing model parallel competitive model hybrid model
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献25

  • 1胡竹菁,朱丽萍.推理结论正确性判定标准再探[J].心理与行为研究,2003,1(4):248-251. 被引量:9
  • 2李红,林崇德.个体解决三项系列问题的心理模型[J].心理学报,2001,33(6):518-525. 被引量:12
  • 3高华,余嘉元.推理过程中非理性现象的新解释[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2006(4):106-110. 被引量:4
  • 4孙彦,李纾,殷晓莉.决策与推理的双系统——启发式系统和分析系统[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(5):721-726. 被引量:143
  • 5Ball, L. J. (2011). The dynamics of reasoning: Chronometric analysis and dual- process theories. In K. I. Manktelow, D. E. Over, & S. Elqayam (Eds.), The science of reason: A festschrift for Jonathan St. B. T. Evans (pp. 283 - 307). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
  • 6Bonnefond, M., & Henst J. (2013). Deduction electrified: ERPs elicited by the processing of words in conditional arguments. Brain and Language, 124, 244-256.
  • 7De Neys, W. (2012). Bias and Conflict: A Case for Logic Intuitions. Perspeegves on Psychology Seianee, 17, 428-433.
  • 8De Neys, W., Cromheeke, S., & Osman, M. (2011). Biased but in doubt: Conflict and decision confidence. PLoS ONE, 6, e15954.
  • 9De Neys, W., Moyens, E., & Vansteenwegen, D. (2010). Feeling we' re biased: Autonomic arousal and reasoning conflict. Cognigve, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 10, 208-216.
  • 10Evans, J. St. B. T. (2003). In two minds: Dual-process accounts of reasoning. TRENDS in Cognitive Science, 7, 454-459.

共引文献18

同被引文献57

引证文献14

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部