期刊文献+

经皮椎间孔镜(TESSYS)治疗不同节段腰椎间盘突出症患者的疗效对比分析 被引量:19

A comparative analysis of TESSYS in the treatment of patients with different segments of lumbar disc herniation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 回顾使用经皮椎间孔镜(TESSYS)治疗的单节段腰椎间盘突出的手术患者共219例,以分析使用TESSYS技术进行治疗的不同节段腰椎间盘突出症患者的疗效对比,统计学分析不同节段术前、术后即刻与术后半年随访的ODI、JOA量表以及VAS指数和Macnab评分的变化。结果显示,对于不同节段的单节段腰椎间盘突出症的患者,使用TESSYS治疗在术后即刻就能得到明显的症状改善,并在术后半年的随访调查中疗效得以保持。对比L4/5及L5/S1节段腰椎间盘突出的患者术后的症状改善程度未见明显差异,但与L3/4及以上节段的患者术后症状的改善程度相比较,L4/5及L5/S1节段的腰椎间盘突出症患者使用TESSYS技术进行治疗在术后疗效上均有显著性的优势。 To compare the efficacy of TESSYS therapy in patients with lumbar disc herniation(LDH)at different segments,219 surgical patients with single-stage lumbar disc herniation which treated with TESSYS were reviewed.Statistical analysis of ODI,JOA scales,VAS index and MacNab score before/after surgery and six months follow-up in different segments.TESSYS treatment significantly improved the symptoms immediately after surgery,and the efficacy was maintained in the follow-up survey after six months.There was no significant difference in the degree of postoperative symptom improvement between L4/5 and L5/S1 segmental lumbar disc herniation in patients with different segments.However,compared with the degree of postoperative improvement in patients with L3/4 or higher segment.TESSYS had significant advantages in treating L4/5 and L5/S1 segments.
作者 田大胜 王其飞 钟华璋 陈磊 朱斌 荆珏华 Tian Dasheng;Wang Qifei;Zhong Huazhang(Dept of Orthopedics,The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University,Hefei 230601)
出处 《安徽医科大学学报》 CAS 北大核心 2018年第11期1791-1794,共4页 Acta Universitatis Medicinalis Anhui
基金 安徽省卫生和计划生育委员会科研计划项目(编号:2016QK053)
关键词 腰椎间盘突出 微创技术 TESSYS技术 lumbar disc herniation minimally invasive technique TESSYS technique
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献26

  • 1Deyo RA,Battie M,Beurskens AJ,et al.Outcome measures for low back pain research:a proposal for standardized use[J].Spine,1998,23:2003-2013.
  • 2Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry disability index[J].Spine,2000,25:2940-2953.
  • 3Fritz JM,Irrgang JJ.A comparison of a modified Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire and the quebec back pain disability Scale[J].Phys Ther,2001,81:776-788.
  • 4Fairbank JC,Couper J,Davies JB,et al.The oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire[J].Physiotherapy,1980,66:271-273.
  • 5Schoppink LE,Van Tulder MW,Koes BW,et al.Reliability and validity of the Dutch adaptation of the quebec back pain disability scale[J].Phys Ther,1996,76:268-275.
  • 6Kopec JA,Esdaile JM,Abrahamowicz M,et al.The quebec back pain disability scale:measurement properties[J].Spine,1995,20:341-352.
  • 7Triano JJ,McGregor M,Hondras MA,et al.Manipulative therapy versus education programs in chronic low back pain[J].Spine,1995,20:948-955.
  • 8Gibson JN, Cowie JG, lprenburg M, Transforaminal endoscopie spinal surgery: the future 'gold standard' for discectomy? A review. Surgeon, 2012,10 ( 5 ) : 290 - 296.
  • 9Hoogland T, Schubert M, Miklitz B. et al. Transforaminal posterolateral endoscopic discectomy with or without the combination of a low-dose chymopapain:a prospective randomized study in 280 consecutive cases. Spine ( Phila Pa 1976 ) , 2006,31 ( 24 ) : E890 - 897.
  • 10Evins AI, Banu MA, Njoku I Jr, et al. Endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy. J Clin Neurosci,2015,22 (4) :730 - 734.

共引文献602

同被引文献201

引证文献19

二级引证文献89

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部