对比介入栓塞和手术夹闭治疗后交通动脉瘤围手术期并发症情况

Perioperative complications of interventional embolization and surgical clipping in patients with communicating artery aneurysms

目的:探讨介入栓塞和手术夹闭治疗后交通动脉瘤围手术期并发症情况。方法:收治后交通动脉瘤患者108例,随机分为A组和B组,各54例。A组患者采用介入栓塞治疗,B组患者采用手术夹闭治疗。结果:两组患者并发症发生率、认知功能障碍情况差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:对后交通动脉瘤患者采用介入栓塞和手术夹闭治疗,均具有良好的临床治疗效果。

Objective:To investigate the perioperative complications of interventional embolization and surgical clipping for communicating aneurysms.Methods:108 patients with posterior communicating artery aneurysm were randomly divided into the A group and the B group with 54 cases in each.The A Group was treated with interventional embolization,and the B group was treated with surgical clipping.Results:There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications and cognitive dysfunction between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion:Interventional embolization and surgical clipping are effective in the treatment of posterior communicating artery aneurysms.