期刊文献+

3.0T非对比增强MRA诊断下肢动脉病变:与CTA对照 被引量:4

Non-contrast enhanced MRA in diagnosis of lower extremity arterial diseases at 3.0T MR:Compared with CTA
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨采用3.0T MR TRANCE技术的非对比增强MRA(NCE-MRA)诊断下肢动脉狭窄性病变的应用价值。方法对38例下肢动脉病变患者依次行NCE-MRA、CTA和DSA检查。由2名高年资医师采用4分法分别对CTA和NCE-MRA图像质量评分,并对下肢动脉狭窄程度分为4级评价。比较NCE-MRA与CTA图像质量评分,评价CTA和NCE-MRA诊断下肢动脉狭窄的一致性;以DSA结果为金标准,计算CTA和NCE-MRA诊断下肢动脉显著性狭窄的敏感度、特异度和准确率,以配对χ~2检验比较二者间的差异。结果 2名医师对NCE-MRA的质量评分为(3.55±0.30)分和(3.49±0.28)分,略低于CTA[(3.53±0.29)分和(3.45±0.34)分,P均<0.001]。CTA与NCE-MRA诊断下肢动脉狭窄程度的一致性良好,2名医师的Kappa值分别为0.92和0.91(P均<0.05)。CTA与NCE-MRA诊断下肢动脉显著性狭窄的敏感度(医师1:94.77%和94.12%;医师2:94.77%和94.12%)、特异度(医师1:93.86%和91.23%;医师2:92.98%和89.47%)和准确率(医师1:94.38%和92.88%;医师2:94.01%和92.13%)的差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。结论采用TRANCE技术的NCE-MRA可清晰显示下肢动脉狭窄性病变,具有较高的图像质量和诊断准确率,可作为下肢动脉病变、特别是合并肾功能不全及存在对比剂禁忌证患者的安全可靠的替代检查方法。 Objective To explore the value of non-contrast enhanced MRA(NCE-MRA)using TRANCE in diagnosis of lower extremity arterial diseases on 3.0T MR.Methods Totally 38 patients with lower extremity arterial diseases underwent NCE-MRA,CTA and DSA examinations.Imaging quality of CTA and NCE-MRA was evaluated with a 4-point scale,and arterial stenosis was graded using a 4-level scale by 2 experienced doctors.The imaging quality was compared,and the agreement between CTA and NCE-MRA was observed.Taking DSA as the golden standards,the sensitivity,specificity and diagnostic accuracy for significant stenosis of lower extremity arteries of CTA and NCE-MRA were calculated and compared.Results The overall imaging quality of NCE-MRA(3.55±0.30 and 3.49±0.28)was lower than those of CTA(3.53±0.29 and 3.45±0.34,both P<0.001)by 2 doctors.Inter-modality agreement between CTA and NCE-MRA was excellent for assessment of stenosis(Kappa=0.92 and 0.91,both P<0.05).There was no statistical difference in sensitivity(doctor 1:94.77%and 94.12%,doctor 2:94.77%and 94.12%),specificity(doctor 1:93.86%and 91.23%,doctor 2:92.98%and 89.47%)nor accuracy(doctor 1:94.38%and 92.88%,doctor 2:94.01%and 92.13%)for significant stenosis of lower extremity arteries between CTA and NCE-MRA(all P>0.05).Conclusion NCE-MRA using TRANCE on 3.0T MR can clearly display lower extremity arterial stenosis with excellent imaging quality and high diagnostic accuracy,which can be used as a safe and reliable alternative method for patients with renal insufficiency or contraindication of contrast agents.
作者 张岚 邢威 吴云虎 张刚 吴涛 ZHANG Lan;XING Wei;WU Yunhu;ZHANG Gang;WU Tao(Departmentof MRI,the First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of CM,Zhengzhou 450000,China;Interventional Department,the First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of CM,Zhengzhou 450000,China)
出处 《中国医学影像技术》 CSCD 北大核心 2018年第10期1494-1498,共5页 Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
基金 河南省中医药科学研究专项课题(2015ZY02014)
关键词 磁共振成像 体层摄影术 X线计算机 血管造影术 下肢动脉疾病 Magnetic resonance imaging Tomography,X-ray computed Angiography Lower extremity arterial disease
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献26

  • 1罗健君,李晓兵,许建铭,须同禄,刘仁坚,秦明明,汤建英.磁共振对比增强血管三维成像技术的方法探讨[J].中国医学影像技术,2004,20(6):891-893. 被引量:17
  • 2Wright VL, Olan W, Dick B, et al. Assessment of CE MRA for the rapid detection of supra aortic vascular disease. Neurology, 2005,65(1) :27 32.
  • 3stalkov IN, Arnold M, Mattle HP, et al. Comparison of the ECST, CC and NASCET grading methods and ultrasound assess ing carotid, European Carotid Surgery Trial. North American Symptomatic Carotid EndarterecyomyTrial. J Neurol, 2000, 247 (9) :681-686.
  • 4Korteweg MA, Kerkhoff H, Bakker J, et al. Efficacy of patient, selection strategies for carotid endarterectomy by contrast en hanced, MRA on a 1.0T machine and duplex ultrasound in a re gionai. ClinRadiol, 2008,63(2):174 183.
  • 5Catalano C, Laghi A, Pediconi F, et al. Magnetic resonance angi ography with contrast media in the study o{ carotid arteries. Radi- ol Mid (Torino), 2001,101(1-2) :54 59.
  • 6Runck F, Steiner RP, Bautz WA, et al. MR imaging: Influence of imaging technique and post processing on measurement of in ternal carotid artery stenosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2008,29 (9) :1736-1742.
  • 7Layton KF, Huston J 3rd, Cloft HJ, et al. Specificity of MR angiography as a confirmatory test for carotid artery stenosis: Is it valid? AJR AmJ Roentgenol, 2007,188('1):1114-1116.
  • 8Fowkes FG, Rudan D, Rudan I, et al. Comparison of global esti- mates of prevalence and risk factors for peripheral artery disease in 2000 and 2010: A systematic review and analysis. Lancet, 2013,382 (9901):1329-1340.
  • 9Hirsch AT, Haskal ZJ, Hertzer NR, et al. ACC/AHA Guide- lines for the Management of Patients with Peripheral Arterial Dis- ease (lower extremity, renal, mesenteric, and abdominal aortic) : A collaborative report from the American Associations for Vascu- lar Surgery/Society for Vascular Surgery, Society for Cardiovas- cular Angiography and Interventions, Society t'or Vascular Medi- cine and Biology, Society of Interventional Radiology, and the ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing committee to develop guidelines for the management of patients with periph- eral arterial disease) summary of recommendations. J Vase In- terv Radiol, 2006, 17(9):1383-1397,quiz 1398.
  • 10Thomsen HS. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: A serious late ad- verse reaction to gadodiamide. Eur Radiol, 2006, 16 ( 12 ):2619-2621.

共引文献6

同被引文献25

引证文献4

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部