期刊文献+

城市知识复杂性空间分异与演化分析:以长江经济带为例 被引量:5

The Geography and Evolution of Complex Knowledge:Take the Yangtze River Economic Belt as an Example
下载PDF
导出
摘要 学者和政策制定者一致认为知识、技术是推动经济长期增长的关键因素之一。从现有文献中可以看出,并非所有知识都具有相同价值。然而,在经济地理学等相关领域研究中,学者们一直关注知识投入和产出的计量分析,却忽视了知识质量评估。利用国家知识产权局1985-2015年专利数据,测度了长江经济带110个城市的知识复杂性,并对知识复杂性的空间分布和演化过程进行可视化表达,探索知识空间分布与其复杂性的关联。研究发现,知识复杂性在长江经济带的分布是不均匀的,具有最复杂技术结构的城市不一定是专利申请最多的城市。联合发明专利数据分析结果显示,当创新合作主体位于不同城市时,复杂专利比非复杂专利更难实现知识流动。 There is consensus among scholars and policy makers that knowledge is one of the key drivers of long-run economic growth.It is also clear from the literature that not all knowledge has the same value.However,too often in economic geography we have been obsessed with counting knowledge inputs and outputs rather than assessing the quality of knowledge produced.In this article we measure the complexity of knowledge,we map the distribution and the evolution of knowledge complexity in the Yangtze River economic belt,and based on patent records from the State Intellectual Property Office to explore how the spatial diffusion of knowledge is linked to complexity.It finds out that knowledge complexity is unevenly distributed and that cities with the most complex technological structures are not necessarily those with the highest rates of patenting.The joint invention patents indicate that more complex patents are less mobility than less complex patents when joint inventors are located in different cities.
作者 马双 Ma Shuang(Institute of Information,Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences,Shanghai 200235,China)
出处 《科技进步与对策》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第19期140-146,共7页 Science & Technology Progress and Policy
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目(41371147) 德国科学基金会项目(LI 981/8-1AOBJ:595493)
关键词 知识复杂性 空间分异 长江经济带 Knowledge Complexity Spatial Variation Yangtze River Economic Belt
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献40

  • 1Hubert G, Thomas S. Technolo~ development mode: A transaction cost conceptualization [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1998,19(6) :515-531.
  • 2Nelson R R,Winter S G. The Schumpeterian tradeoff revisited [ J 1. American Economic Review, 1982,72( l ) : 114-132.
  • 3Hagedoorn J, Duysters G. External Sources of Innovative Capabilities:The Preferences for Strategic Alliances or Merg-ers and Acquisitions [J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2002,39(2):167-188.
  • 4Asheim B T, Smith H L, Oughton C. Regional Innovation Systems:Theory, Empirics and Policy[Jl. Regional Studies, 2011,45(7) :875-891.
  • 5Cooke P, Morgan K. The Network Paradigm:New Departures in Corporate and Regional Development[J]. Environment & Planning D : Society & Space, 1993,11 (5) : 543-564.
  • 6Fischer M M, Varga A. Technological innovation and interfirm cooperation: an exploratory analysis using survey data from manufacturing firms in the metropolitan region of Vienna [J]. International Journal of Technology Management, 2002,24 (7) : 724-742.
  • 7Shan W, Walker G, Kogut B. Inter-firm cooperation and start up innovation in the biotechnology industry[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1994,15(5) :387-394.
  • 8Fritsch M, Franke G. Innovation, regional knowledge spillovers and R&D co-operation[J]. Research Policy, 2004,33 (2) :245-255.
  • 9Von Hippel. The Sources of Innovations[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988.
  • 10Tether B S. Who co-operates for innovation,and why. An empirical analysis [J ]. Research Policy, 2002,31 (6) : 947-967.

共引文献5

同被引文献133

引证文献5

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部