期刊文献+

涉环境国际投资仲裁案中比例原则的适用 被引量:1

On Application of Proportionality Principle in the International Investment Arbitration Cases with Environmental Components
下载PDF
导出
摘要 国际投资活动的复杂性注定了外国投资者利益与东道国环境利益之间摩擦不断,顾此失彼。很有必要找出一个外在的衡量标准,通过这一客观标尺仲裁庭能够在做出裁决时有效地确定:东道国的监管行为是真正地出于保护环境的目的,还是仅为一个对外国投资者所创设的、站不住脚的投资障碍。理论与实践证明,相较于其仲裁审查标准,成功适用于涉环境国际投资仲裁程序中的比例原则正是为着实现有效均衡外国投资者投资权益与东道国环境利益的不二选择。对涉环境国际投资仲裁庭的比例原则适用实践进行认真研读,无疑将有助于促进我国投资条约内"环境措施"条款的正确解释与施行。 Owing to the complexity of the international investment activities,friction easily arises between the foreign investors′benefits and the host country′s environmental interest.It is of great significance to find out an outer measuring standard,according to which the investment tribunals are able to effectively decide whether the host country′s regulatory actions are truly for the purpose of protecting the environment,or nothing more than the groundless obstacles designed for infringing the foreign investors.It has been testified both in theory and practice that,compared with other arbitration review criteria,the proportionality principle which has been successfully applied in the international investment arbitration cases with environmental components is the only ideal choice of efficiently balancing the foreign investors′benefits and the host country′s environmental interest.The close examination of the application of the proportionality principle by the arbitrators in the international investment arbitration cases with environmental components is of great help to correctly interpret and implement the″environmental measure″clauses in the investment treaties of China.
作者 银红武 YIN Hongwu(Law School/″Belt and Road″Research Institute,Hunan Normal University,Changsha,Hunan 410081,China)
出处 《广州大学学报(社会科学版)》 2018年第9期52-58,共7页 Journal of Guangzhou University:Social Science Edition
基金 湖南省哲学社会科学基金一般项目(17YBA274) 湖南师范大学"一流学科"建设项目
关键词 国际投资仲裁 环境成分 比例原则 适用 international investment arbitration environmental components the proportionality principle application
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献38

  • 1石化刚.全球公共利益和谐治理化[J].合作经济与科技,2007(10S):76-77. 被引量:2
  • 2W.Burke-White,Andreas von Staden.Investment Protection in Extraordinary Times:The Interpretation and Application of Non-Precluded Measures Provisions in Bilateral Investment Treaties[J].Virginia Journal of International Law,2008(2):381-386.
  • 3Stephan W.Schill,Robyn Briese.“If the State Considers”:Self-Judging Clauses in International Dispute Settlement[J].Max Plank Yearbook of United Nations Law,2009(13):61-140.
  • 4Diane A.Desierto.Necessity and“Supplementary Means of Interpretation”for Non-precluded Measures in Bilateral Investment Treaties[J].University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law,2010(3):827-934.
  • 5Kenneth Vandevelde.Of Politics and Markets:The Shifting Ideology of the BITs[J].International Tax&Business Lawyer,1993(11):159-170.
  • 6Thomas J.Bodie.Politics and the Emergence of an Activist International Court of Justice[M].Westport:Praeger Publishers Inc.,1995:221.
  • 7Jose E.Alvarez,Kathryn Khamsi.The Argentine Crisis and Foreign Investors:A Glimpse into the Heart of the Investment Regime[G]//Karl P.Sauvant.The Yearbook on International Investment Law and Policy 2008/2009.New York:Oxford University Press,2009:379-478.
  • 8Gebhard Bucheler.Proportionality in Investor-State Arbitration[M].New York:Oxford University Press,2015.
  • 9W.Burke-White,Andreas von Staden.The Need for Public Law Standards of Review in Investor-State Arbitration[G]//Stephan Schill.International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law.New York:Oxford University Press,2010:689-720.
  • 10W.Burke-White,Andreas von Staden.Private Litigation in a Public Law Sphere:the Standard of Review in Investor-state Arbitrations[J].The Yale Journal of International Law,2010(2):283-346.

共引文献10

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部