期刊文献+

深圳市市属三级医院住院医疗服务综合评价对比分析--基于DRGs与DMIAES疾病风险调整模型研究 被引量:13

Comparative Analysis of Comprehensive Evaluation of Inpatient Medical Services of Municipal Tertiary Hospital in Shenzhen City:Based on DRGs and DMIAES Disease Risk-Adjusted Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的使用DRGs和疾病管理智能分析和评估系统(Disease Management Intelligent Analytic and Evaluation Sys-tem, DMIAES)疾病风险调整模型从医疗质量、工作效率、费用控制多个维度对住院医疗服务进行综合评价,分析两种方法的区别,为医院持续改进提供合理的管理目标和精细的评价方法。方法对深圳市市属8家三级医院2015年的出院患者进行DRGs分组后,建立DMIAES疾病风险调整模型,再利用模型对2016年出院患者的病死率、住院日和住院费用进行预测和评价,并利用DRGs相关评价指数分析同期数据。结果 DRGs相关评价指数与DMIAES结果有所不同,后者经过疾病风险调整后,得到8家医院的ACMI值以及住院日和住院费用的O/E值,提示各家医院在住院医疗质量方面均有所改进,但大部分医院在费用控制和住院日管理方面尚有提高空间。结论 DMIAES用数学建模的方法,对出院患者进行疾病风险调整,在此基础上进行医疗服务的综合评价,更为公平、合理,更有利于医院的持续改进。 Objective The DRGs and DMIAES disease risk-adjusted model were used to evaluate the inpatient medical service from the medical quality,work efficiency and cost control.The difference between the two methods was analyzed,and the rational management goals and the fine evaluation methods were provided for the continuous improvement of the hospital.Methods After DRGs grouping the discharged patients in 8 public hospitals of Shenzhen in 2015,the DMIAES disease risk-adjusted model was established,and the mortality rate,length of stay and medical cost of discharged patients in 2016 were predicted and evaluated by using the model.The related evaluation index of DRGs was used to analyze the data of the same period.Results The related evaluation index of DRGs is different from that of DMIAES.After the disease risk adjustment of DMIAES,the ACMI value,the O/E value of length of stay and medical cost of 8 hospitals were obtained.It showed that all hospitals had improved the quality of hospitalization,but there was still room for improvement in cost control and length of stay.Conclusion DMIAES uses the method of mathematical modeling to adjust the disease risk of discharged patients.On the basis of this,the comprehensive evaluation of medical services is more fair and reasonable,which is more conducive to the continuous improvement of the hospital.
作者 吴晓云 徐勇 刘莉 郭志武 陈霞 林汉城 王大平 罗乐宣 WU Xiao-yun;XU Yong;LIU Li(Shenzhen People’s Hospital,Shenzhen,Guangdong,518020,China)
出处 《中国医院管理》 北大核心 2018年第10期12-15,共4页 Chinese Hospital Management
基金 深圳市经济贸易和信息化委员会研究课题(20170731174457794)
关键词 疾病管理智能分析和评估系统 疾病风险调整 疾病诊断相关分组 医院评价 DMIAES disease risk-adjustment DRGs hospital evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献17

  • 1WY Jian,YM Huang,M Hu,et al.Performance evaluation of inpatient service in Beijing:a horizontal comparison with risk adjustment based on Diagnosis Related Groups[EB/OL].(2009-04-30)[2010-04-06].http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/9/72.
  • 2Glance LG;,Osler TM,Dick A.Bating the quality of intensive care units:is it a function of the intensive care unit scoring system[J].Critical Care Medicine,2002,30:1976-82.
  • 3Barros PP.Random output and hospital performance[J].Health Care Management Science,2003 (11):219-228.
  • 4Needham MB,Hailing JF.Factors which predict patient satisfaction of nutrition care in a hospital settiag[J].Journal of the American Dietetic Association,1998,98(9):107.
  • 5Hannan EL,Wu C,DeLong ER,et al. Predicting risk-adjusted mortalityfor CABG surgery : logistic versus hierarchical logistic models. MedCare,2005 ,43(7) :726-735.
  • 6Ding YY. Risk adjustment:towards achieving meaningful comparison ofhealth outcomes in the real world. Ann Acad Med Singapore, 2009,38(6):552-557.
  • 7Krumholz HM, Wang Y, Mattera JA, et al. An administrative claimsmodel suitable for profiling hospital performance based on 30-day mortal-ity rates among patients with heart failure. Circulation, 2006,113(13):1693-1701.
  • 8Krumholz HM,Chen J,Wang Y,et al. Comparing AMI mortality amonghospitals in patients 65 years of age and older : evaluating methods of riskadjustment. Circulation, 1999,99(23) :2986-2992.
  • 9Shahian DM,Torchiana DF,Shemin RJ,et al. Massachusetts cardiac sur-gery report card: implications of statistical methodology. Ann ThoracSurg,2005,80(6) :2106-2113.
  • 10Stukenborg GJ, Wagner DP, Harrell FE Jr,et al. Which hospitals havesignificantly better or worse than expected mortality rates for acute myo-cardial infarction patients. Improved risk adjustment with present-at-ad-mission diagnoses. Circulation,2007,116(25) :2960-2968.

共引文献65

同被引文献105

引证文献13

二级引证文献53

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部