期刊文献+

斑块切除联合药物涂层球囊治疗股腘动脉硬化闭塞症应用进展 被引量:9

Application progresses of atherectomy combined with drug-coated balloon for femoropopliteal artery disease
下载PDF
导出
摘要 股腘动脉(FPA)是下肢动脉硬化闭塞症的好发部位。腔内治疗是治疗FPA硬化闭塞症的主要方式,然而术后再狭窄是目前面临的主要问题。与普通球囊血管成形术相比,药物涂层球囊(DCB)可明显提高管腔通畅率。良好的血管准备是充分发挥DCB预防再狭窄作用的前提,但在严重钙化、完全闭塞以及支架内再狭窄等复杂性FPA病变的治疗过程中,由于弹性回缩及限流性夹层等原因,DCB的应用受到限制。斑块切除技术虽不能提高血管的远期通畅率,但管腔即刻血流恢复良好,可为应用DCB创造条件。本文基于斑块切除系统和DCB的特点对二者联合治疗FPA硬化闭塞症的应用进展进行综述。 Femoropopliteal artery(FPA)is the most common site of peripheral arteriosclerosis obliterans.Endovascular therapy has become the main approach to treat FPA arteriosclerosis obliterans,but restenosis after operation is the main problem.Compared with traditional plain balloon angioplasty,drug-coated balloon(DCB)can significantly improve the primary patency rate.Proper vascular preparation is prerequisite,and DCB can fully exert the therapeutic effect of preventing restenosis.However,for complex FPA lesions such as severe calcification,total occlusion and in-stent restenosis,the application of DCB is still limited due to elastic recoil and flow-limiting dissection.Although atherectomy fails to improve the long-term vessel patency,it is likely to obtain optimal acute angiographic results in preparation for the application of DCB.Application progresses of atherectomy combined with DCB for FPA arteriosclerosis obliterans based on characteristics of plaque removal system and DCB were reviewed in this article.
作者 甄艳华 郑加贺 ZHEN Yanhua;ZHENG Jiahe(Department of Radiology,Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004,China)
出处 《中国介入影像与治疗学》 CSCD 北大核心 2018年第10期632-636,共5页 Chinese Journal of Interventional Imaging and Therapy
关键词 股动脉 腘动脉 动脉硬化 闭塞性 斑块切除术 药物 球囊 Femoral artery Popliteal artery Arteriosclerosis obliterans Atherectomy Drug Balloon
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献21

  • 1WRITING GROUP MEMBERS; Lloyd-Jones D, Adams RJ, Brown TM, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2010 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 2010, 121(7): e46-e215.
  • 2Norgren L, Hiatt WR, Dormandy JA, et al. Inter-Society Consensus for the management of peripheral arterial disease (TASC Ⅱ). J VascSurg, 2007, 45 Suppl S: S5-S67 .
  • 3Adam DJ, Beard JD, Cleveland T, et al. Bypass versusangioplasty in severe ischaemia of the leg (BASIL): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 2005, 366(951): 1925-1934.
  • 4Aihara H, Soga Y, Mii S, et al. Comparison of long-term outcome after endovascular therapy versusbypass surgery in claudication patients with Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus-ⅡC and D femoropopliteal disease. Circ J, 2014, 78(2): 457-464.
  • 5Met R, Van Lienden KP, Koelemay MJ, et al. Subintimal angioplasty for peripheral arterial occlusive disease: a systematic review. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2008, 31(4): 687-697.
  • 6Balasubramanian SK, Venkatasubramanian RT, Menon A, et al. Thermal injury prediction during cryoplasty through in vitro characterization of smooth muscle cell biophysics and viability. Ann Biomed Eng, 2008, 36(1): 86-101.
  • 7Spiliopoulos S, Katsanos K, Karnabatidis D, et al. Cryoplasty versusconventional balloon angioplasty of the femoropopliteal artery in diabetic patients: long-term results from a prospective randomized single-center controlled trial. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2010, 33(5): 929-938.
  • 8Diaz ML, Urtasun F, Barberena J, et al. Cryoplasty versusconventional angioplasty in femoropopliteal arterial recanalization: 3-year analysis of reintervention-free survival by treatment received. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2011, 34(5): 911-917.
  • 9Cassese S, Byrne RA, Ott I, et al. Paclitaxel-coated versusuncoated balloon angioplasty reduces target lesion revascularization in patients with femoropopliteal arterial disease: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Circ Cardiovasc Interv, 2012, 5(4): 582-589.
  • 10Fusaro M, Cassese S, Ndrepepa G, et al. Paclitaxel-coated balloon or primary bare nitinol stent for revascularization of femoropopliteal artery: a meta-analysis of randomized trials versusuncoated balloon and an adjusted indirect comparison. Int J Cardiol, 2013, 168(4): 4002-4009.

共引文献11

同被引文献71

引证文献9

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部