期刊文献+

超声弹性对比指数在淋巴结良恶性鉴别诊断中的应用价值 被引量:8

Value of Elasticity Contrast Index of Ultrasonography in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Cervical Lymph Nodes
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评估超声弹性对比指数(ECI)在颈部淋巴结良恶性鉴别诊断中的应用价值。方法 2016年12月至2017年4月在北京大学第三医院超声科连续对48例患者的颈部淋巴结进行二维超声及ECI评估,根据是否需要手动加压分为两组。以淋巴结病理或临床随访结果为金标准,比较二维超声、ECI测值及两者联合在鉴别淋巴结良恶性的诊断价值。结果最终纳入46例患者的138枚淋巴结,其中,良性淋巴结76枚,恶性淋巴结62枚;恶性淋巴结的平均ECI值为1. 69±0. 89,明显高于良性淋巴结的1. 32±0. 87 (t=-2. 46,P=0. 015)。二维超声鉴别颈部良恶性淋巴结的ROC曲线下面积为0. 899,最佳界值为≥7分,敏感度为93. 5%,特异度为84. 2%; ECI的ROC曲线下面积为0. 649,最佳界值为1. 25,敏感度为59. 7%,特异度为60. 5%;两者联合的ROC曲线下面积为0. 724,敏感度为93. 5%,特异度为51. 3%。无需加压组恶性淋巴结的平均ECI值为1. 77±0. 94,明显高于良性淋巴结的1. 26±0. 81 (t=-3. 09,P=0. 003);手动加压组恶性淋巴结的中位ECI值为1. 33 (1. 01,1. 44),与良性淋巴结的1. 32 (0. 78,2. 18)差异无统计学意义(z=-0. 20,P=0. 843)。结论二维超声在颈部淋巴结良恶性鉴别诊断中的诊断效能优于ECI和二维超声与ECI联合。ECI在甲状腺以外器官中的应用尚待进一步研究。 Objective To investigate the diagnostic value of elasticity contrast index(ECI)in the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant cervical lymph nodes.Methods Cervical lymph nodes of 48 patients were examined by traditional ultrasound and ECI in Peking University Third Hospital between December 2016 and April 2017.Patients were further divided into free-hand group and non-free-hand group according to the use of manual compression or not.With pathological or clinical follow-up results as the gold standard,we compared the diagnostic values of traditional ultrasound,ECI,and their combination in the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant lymph nodes.Results Totally 138 lymph nodes were collected from 46 patients,among which 76 were benign and 62 were malignant.The ECI value of malignant lymph nodes(1.69±0.89)were significantly higher than that of benign lymph nodes(1.32±0.87)(t=-2.46,P=0.015).The area under receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve for traditional ultrasound in discrimination of malignant cervical lymph nodes with benign ones was 0.899,with an optimal cut-off value of 7,which had a sensitivity of 93.5%and a specificity of 84.2%.The area under ROC curve for ECI was 0.649,with an optimal cut-off value of 1.25,which had a sensitivity of 59.7%and a specificity of 60.5%.For their combination,the area under ROC curve was 0.724,with a sensitivity of 93.5%and a specificity of 51.3%.In the group without using free-hand technique,the mean ECI value was 1.77±0.94 for malignant nodes,which was significantly higher than that(1.26±0.81)for benign nodes(t=-3.09,P=0.003).In the group requiring free-hand technique,the ECI value for malignant nodes was 1.33(1.01,1.44),showing no significant difference with benign ones[1.32(0.78,2.18);z=-0.20,P=0.843].Conclusions Conventional ultrasound has higher diagnostic value than ECI and their combination in differentiating benign and malignant lymph nodes.The role of ECI in evaluating other organs requires further investigations.
作者 葛喜凤 李磊 崔立刚 薛恒 GE Xifeng;LI Lei;CUI Ligang;XUE Heng(Department of Ultrasound,Peking University Third Hospital,Beijing 100191,China;Department of General Surgery,Peking University Third Hospital,Beijing 100191,China)
出处 《中国医学科学院学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2018年第5期680-684,共5页 Acta Academiae Medicinae Sinicae
关键词 颈部淋巴结 弹性成像 弹性对比指数 cervical lymph nodes elastography elasticity contrast index
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献14

共引文献33

同被引文献76

引证文献8

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部