区域科技创新与可持续发展空间差异研究——以山东省国家可持续发展实验区为例

Regional Spatial Differences of Scientific-technical Innovation and Sustainable Development——A Case Study of CNSCs in Shandong Province

[目的]探讨不同区域实验区科技创新与可持续发展关联性的空间差异,为山东省可持续发展提供决策参考。[方法]从科技创新与可持续发展层面选取29个指标,运用灰色关联模型计算出2009—2015年鲁东、鲁中、鲁西实验区总体的科技创新与可持续发展度及协调度关联度,2015年各实验区科技创新与子系统发展度、可持续发展度及协调度关联系数,并进行分类。[结果]三大区域实验区科技创新与可持续发展度关联度较高,呈现自西向东阶梯式分布,与协调度关联度相对较低,呈现"中间高两头低"的格局;各实验区关联性显著,科技创新在推动经济、社会、环境协调可持续发展方面做出重大贡献,但不同区域科技支撑侧重领域不同;各实验区科技创新与可持续发展度、协调度关联系数差异明显。鲁东以中、高关联型为主,鲁中以高关联型为主,鲁西为高关联型。[结论]实验区科技创新与可持续发展关联性的空间差异较大,需因地制宜探索适合该区域发展的模式。

[Objective]To explore the spatial differences about relevance between scientific-technical innovation and sustainable development of China National Sustainable Communities(CNSCs)in different regions,and to provide decision reference for sustainable development of Shandong Province.[Methods]By selecting 29 index from two aspects of scientific-technical innovation and sustainable development,using grey correlation model calculated the correlation degree of scientific-technical innovation with sustainable development degree and coordination degree of CNSCs in eastern,central and western of Shandong Province in 2009-2015,calculated and classified correlation coefficient of scientific-technical innovation with subsystem development degree,sustainable development degree and coordination degree of every CNSCs in 2015.[Results]There was a high relevance between scientific-technical innovation and sustainable development degree in CNSCs of three region,showed the ladder distribution from west to east.A low relevance between scientific-technical innovation and coordination degree,showed the pattern of“high in the middle and low in the two ends”;There had a significant relevance of every CNSCs,and scientific-technical innovation made contributions to the promotions of economy,society and environment coordinated and sustainable development,but it focused on different aspects.The differences of correlation coefficient is obvious between scientific-technical innovation with sustainable development degree and coordination degree,the east is mainly moderate correlation type and high correlation type,the center is mainly high correlation type,the west belongs to high correlation type.[Conclusion]There was great difference in the spatial differences about relevance between scientific-technical innovation and sustainable development of CNSCs,and it was necessary to explore path which suits for local conditions.