期刊文献+

胃癌全胃切除术后患者行家庭肠内营养的可行性研究 被引量:7

The Feasibility of Family Enteral Nutrition After Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨和研究胃癌全胃切除术后患者行家庭肠内营养的可行性。方法:选取河北北方学院附属第一医院2014年2月—2018年2月收治的胃癌全胃切除术患者72例,随机分为观察组38例和对照组34例,两组患者术后在院内均经鼻空肠营养管行肠内营养支持,对照组出院后拔除鼻空肠营养管,观察组继续保留肠内营养支持,持续时间为4w。观察和比较两组出院时或出院后4w各营养指标和生活质量指标变化。结果:两组出院时体重下降和上臂围测量值以及血清总蛋白、白蛋白和血红蛋白指标无明显差异(P>0. 05),出院后4w观察组体重下降值明显低于对照组(P <0. 05),上臂围测量值和血清总蛋白、白蛋白、血红蛋白指标明显高于对照组(P <0. 05或P <0. 01)。出院后4w观察组功能状态(KPS)评分、生活质量指数(QLI)和EORTC OLQ—C30量表指标明显优于对照组(P <0. 05或P <0. 01)。结论:胃癌全胃切除患者行家庭肠内营养支持能明显改善患者不良营养状况和提高生活质量,安全性高,值得在临床上推广使用。 Objective To explore and study the feasibility of family enteral nutrition after total gastrectomy for gastric cancer.Method A total of 72 patients with total gastrectomy were selected from our hospital from February 2014 to February 2018,and a total of 72 patients were randomly divided into 38 in observation group and 34 in control group.The two groups of patients received nutritional support in the hospital after surgery,after discharge from the control group,the nasal jejunal nutrition tube was removed and the observation group continued to retain enteral nutrition support for 4 weeks.The changes of nutrition indicators and quality of life in two groups after discharge or 4 weeks after discharge were observed and compared.Result There was no significant difference in weight loss and upper arm circumference measurements between the two groups,as well as serum total protein,albumin and hemoglobin(P>0.05).The weight loss of the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group 4 weeks after discharge(P<0.05).The measurements of upper arm circumference and serum total protein,albumin and hemoglobin were significantly higher than those in the control group(P<0.05/P<0.01).4 weeks after discharge,the functional status(KPS)score,QLI and EORTC olq-c30 scale were significantly better than those in the control group(P<0.05/P<0.01).Conclusion The family enteral nutrition support can obviously improve the patients poor nutrition status and improve the quality of life,the safety is high,and it is worth populating in clinical practice.
作者 任惠敏 苏卓彬 杨永江 赵轶峰 王晓元 黄迪 李曙光 REN Hui-min;SU Zhuo-bin;YANG Yong-jiang;ZHAO Yi-feng;WANG Xiao-yuan;HUANG Di;LI Shu-guang(Gastrointestinal Tumor Surgery,First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei Northern University,Zhangjiakou 075000,China)
出处 《中国食物与营养》 2018年第10期61-63,共3页 Food and Nutrition in China
基金 张家口市科技攻关计划项目项目(项目编号:1321095D)
关键词 胃癌 全胃切除 家庭肠内营养 可行性 cancer of the stomach total gastric resection family enteral nutrition feasibility
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献63

  • 1谢青,周文,张文东.肠内营养和肠外营养对老年消化道肿瘤患者的影响[J].中国老年学杂志,2005,25(8):961-962. 被引量:4
  • 2赵晓雷,彭俊生.不同营养支持方法在胃癌病人术后的应用[J].肠外与肠内营养,2007,14(1):32-34. 被引量:35
  • 3李榕,韩宝惠.肿瘤患者营养不良筛查评估及意义[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志,2007,14(16):1269-1271. 被引量:26
  • 4Parkin DM, Ferlay J, Curado MP, et al. Fifty years of cancer inci- dence : CI5I-IX[ J]. Int J Cancer,2010,127 (12) :2918.
  • 5Brenner H, Rothenbacher D, Arndt V. Epidemiology of stomach canc- er[J]. Methods Mol Bio11,2009,472(2) :467.
  • 6Wie GA, Cho-YA, Kim ST, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of malnu- trition and stage in the National Cancer Center in Korea[J]. Nutri- tion,2010,26 (3) :263.
  • 7Bozzetti F, Gavazzi C, Miceli R, et al. Perioperative total parenteral nutrition in malnourished, gastrointedtinal cancer patients: a random- ized, clinical teial [ J ]. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, 2003,24 ( 1 ) : 7.
  • 8Warren, Kern KA R. Nutritionan screening and assessment tools for use by nurses :literature[ J]. J Adv Nurs,2005,50( 1 ) :69.
  • 9Green SM, Watson R. Nutritional screening and assessment tools for use by nurses:literature rewiew[J]. J Adb Nurs,2005,50 (1) :160.
  • 10TF Amaral, A Antunes. An evaluation of three nutritional screening tools in aportuguese oncology centre, The British Dietetic Association Ltd[J] Hum Nute Diet,2008,21 (5) :575.

共引文献67

同被引文献84

引证文献7

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部