期刊文献+

Random field characterization of uniaxial compressive strength and elastic modulus for intact rocks 被引量:3

Random field characterization of uniaxial compressive strength and elastic modulus for intact rocks
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Rock properties exhibit spatial variabilities due to complex geological processes such as sedimentation,metamorphism, weathering, and tectogenesis. Although recognized as an important factor controlling the safety of geotechnical structures in rock engineering, the spatial variability of rock properties is rarely quantified. Hence, this study characterizes the autocorrelation structures and scales of fluctuation of two important parameters of intact rocks, i.e. uniaxial compressive strength(UCS) and elastic modulus(EM).UCS and EM data for sedimentary and igneous rocks are collected. The autocorrelation structures are selected using a Bayesian model class selection approach and the scales of fluctuation for these two parameters are estimated using a Bayesian updating method. The results show that the autocorrelation structures for UCS and EM could be best described by a single exponential autocorrelation function. The scales of fluctuation for UCS and EM respectively range from 0.3 m to 8.0 m and from 0.3 m to 8.4 m.These results serve as guidelines for selecting proper autocorrelation functions and autocorrelation distances for rock properties in reliability analyses and could also be used as prior information for quantifying the spatial variability of rock properties in a Bayesian framework. Rock properties exhibit spatial variabilities due to complex geological processes such as sedimentation,metamorphism, weathering, and tectogenesis. Although recognized as an important factor controlling the safety of geotechnical structures in rock engineering, the spatial variability of rock properties is rarely quantified. Hence, this study characterizes the autocorrelation structures and scales of fluctuation of two important parameters of intact rocks, i.e. uniaxial compressive strength(UCS) and elastic modulus(EM).UCS and EM data for sedimentary and igneous rocks are collected. The autocorrelation structures are selected using a Bayesian model class selection approach and the scales of fluctuation for these two parameters are estimated using a Bayesian updating method. The results show that the autocorrelation structures for UCS and EM could be best described by a single exponential autocorrelation function. The scales of fluctuation for UCS and EM respectively range from 0.3 m to 8.0 m and from 0.3 m to 8.4 m.These results serve as guidelines for selecting proper autocorrelation functions and autocorrelation distances for rock properties in reliability analyses and could also be used as prior information for quantifying the spatial variability of rock properties in a Bayesian framework.
出处 《Geoscience Frontiers》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2018年第6期1609-1618,共10页 地学前缘(英文版)
关键词 UNIAXIAL COMPRESSIVE strength Elastic MODULUS Scale of FLUCTUATION AUTOCORRELATION function Spatial variability Bayesian approach Uniaxial compressive strength Elastic modulus Scale of fluctuation Autocorrelation function Spatial variability Bayesian approach
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献21

  • 1Attoh-Okine, N.O., Cooger, K., Mensah, S., 2009. Multivariate adaptive regression (MARS) and hinged hyperplanes (HHP) for doweled pavement performance modeling. Journal of Construction and Building Materials 23, 3020-3023.
  • 2Das, S.K., Basudhar, EK., 2006. Undrained lateral load capacity of piles in clay using artificial neural network. Computer and Geotechnics 33 (8), 454-459.
  • 3Demuth, H., Beale, M., 2003. Neural Network Toolbox for MATLAB-user Guide Version 4.1. The Math Works Inc.
  • 4Friedman, J.H., 1991. Multivariate adaptive regression splines. The Annals of Sta- tistics 19, 1-141.
  • 5Gandomi, A.H., Roke, D.A., 2013. Intelligent formulation of structural engineering systems. In: Seventh M1T Conference on Computational Fluid and Solid Me- chanics- Focus: Multiphysics and Multiscale, 12-14 Jun., Cambridge, USA.
  • 6Garson, G.D., 1991. Interpreting neural-network connection weights. Al Expert 6 (7), 47-51.
  • 7Goh, A.T.C., Zhang, W.G., 2014. An improvement to MLR model for predicting liquefaction-induced lateral spread using Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines. Engineering Geology 170, 1 10.
  • 8Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., Friedman, J., 2009. The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference and Prediction, second ed. Springer.
  • 9Jekabsons, G., 2010. VariReg: a Software Tool for Regression Modelling Using Various Modeling Methods. Riga Technical University. http://www.cs.rtu.lv/ jekabsons/.
  • 10Jeon, J.K., Rahman, M.S., 2008. Fuzzy Neural Network Models for Geotechnical Problems. Research Project FHWA/NC/2006-52. North Carolina State Univer- sity, Raleigh, N.C.

共引文献34

同被引文献34

引证文献3

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部