期刊文献+

别现代:维度与坐标——兼以纹枰论道 被引量:3

The Bie-Modern: Dimension and Coordinate
下载PDF
导出
摘要 别现代时期是人类社会维度迅速扩张且最为繁杂的时期。维度扩张既带来多文化、大视野、超视距的展开,又造成维度交错、重叠带来的坐标消失、价值观混乱、精神危机的困局。在多维社会中,坐标不确定极易导致人们的角色反串和多面人特征。围棋是在有无、虚实的多维世界中发挥每个棋子的作用而确立坐标的现代社会隐喻,其形、其势、其空,无不具有审美的神韵,是自然之道与人生之道的完美结合。社会维度中人生坐标的确立有赖于每个个体受到尊重并充分发挥其作用,在复合与重合中确定坐标。与别现代的多而杂相比,别现代主义却是一而纯,即主张在多维混沌的世界中,首先形成纯而一的目标定位,形成自我更新、自我调节、自我超越的核心价值观和实践功能。 The Bie-modern period is the most complicated period with the rapid dimension expansion of the human society.The dimension expansion leads to the spread of multi-culture,broad view,over horizon,and brings about alternate dimension,disappearance of coordinate,confusion of values,and spiritual crisis as well.In the multidimensional society,uncertainty of coordinates easily leads to cross-role play and characteristics of“multi-faces person”.Weichi(the game of go)is the metaphor in modern society,and every piece plays its function and has its own coordinate.The form,potential and vehemence of Weichi is full of aesthetic flavor,and Weichi is the perfect combination of nature and life.The establishment of life coordinate of social dimension depends on every individual’s function.Compared with miscellaneous features of the Bie-mordern,Bie-modernism is characterized with purity and oneness.Bie-modernism advocates that the life coordinate with purity and oneness should be formed,and self-renewal,self-regulatory and self-transcendent core values and practical function should be established as well.
作者 王建疆 WANG Jianjiang(College of Humanities and Communications,Shanghai Normal University,Shanghai 200234,China)
出处 《上海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第5期183-191,共9页 Journal of Shanghai Normal University(Philosophy & Social Sciences Edition)
基金 国家社科基金项目"别现代语境中英雄空间的解构与建构问题研究"(15BZW025)阶段性成果 上海高校高峰学科建设计划资助"中国语言文学" 上海师范大学艺术学理论重点学科(A-0233-16-002014)阶段性成果
关键词 别现代 维度 坐标 纹枰论道 围棋 the Bie-modern dimension coordinate Weichi
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献20

  • 1慧能.六祖坛经.南京.凤凰出版社,2010.
  • 2沃尔夫冈·威尔施,周宪,许钧译.我们的后现代的现代(第五版前言).北京.商务印书馆.2004.3.
  • 3Martin Jay. Returning the Gaze: The American Responseto the French Critique of Ocularcentrism.Refractions ofViolence.London: Routledge, 2003 : 133-147.
  • 4Fredric Jameson. Notes on Globalization as aPhilosophical Issue. Fredric Jameson and Masao Miyoshi(eds.) .The Cultures of Globalization. Durham: DukeUniversity Press, 1998 : 67.
  • 5Richard Shusterman. Internationalism in Philosophy.Metaphilosophy.28 (4),1997 : 289-301.
  • 6Thomas DaCosta Kaufmann. Toward a Geography of Art.Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2004.
  • 7Jean-Francois Lyotard, Peregrinations. Law, Form,Event. New York: Columbia University Press, 1988.
  • 8Ales Erjavec. Philosophy: National and International.Metaphilosophy. 28 (4),1997 : 329-345.
  • 9Erjavec. Eastern Europe, Art, and the Politics ofRepresentation.boundary 2. 14(1),2014 : 51-77.
  • 10Fredric Jameson, The Political Unconscious (Ithaca: Comell University Press 1981 ), p. 208.

同被引文献33

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部