摘要
城市扩张对耕地利用强度的影响关系到我国粮食安全。本文基于江苏省县级面板数据,分析城市扩张对耕地利用强度的影响机制,结合外部环境与内部禀赋因素,构建耕地利用强度影响模型,运用双向固定效应模型估计城市扩张对耕地利用强度的综合影响,并通过加入交互项的方式研究区域工业化水平与农户资源禀赋的调节作用。结果表明:第一,由于稀缺效应和资本效应的相互弥补抵消,城市扩张对耕地利用强度的影响在统计上不显著。处于不同经济发展阶段的区域,城市扩张所产生稀缺效应以及资本效应不断变化,因此政策上更应该关注如何发挥其正向效应,消减其负向效应。第二,在寻找调节城市扩张影响耕地利用强度的中间变量时发现:(1)当工业总产值大于509. 73亿元时,城市扩张对耕地利用强度的偏效应为负,即城市扩张导致耕地利用强度下降;反之,城市扩张将会促使耕地利用强度上升。(2)当地均机械投入大于816. 39 kW/km2时,城市扩张会促进耕地利用强度提高;相反,城市扩张将会阻碍耕地利用强度提高。(3)当户均耕地面积小于3. 36亩或大于13. 26亩时,城市扩张对耕地利用强度产生正向影响;当户均耕地面积介于3. 36~13. 26亩时,城市扩张对耕地利用强度产生负向影响。因此,为了引导城市扩张对农业投入的正向促进作用,需要协调城市扩张与产业发展,同时提升区域农业机械化水平,依托农地流转实现农地适度规模经营,并应当尽快完成工业化快速发展区域基本农田和城市发展边界划定工作。
The impact of urban expansion on the arable land use intensity is critical to the food security of China.Based on the county-level panel data of Jiangsu Province,this paper analyzed the mechanism of urban expansion’s influence on the arable land use intensity.Combining with the external environment conditions and internal endowments,this paper constructed a two-way fixed effects model to estimate the impact of urban expansion on arable land use intensity and study on the adjustment effect of regional industrialization level and farmers’resource endowment by adding interaction items.The results showed that the effect of urban expansion on the agricultural land use intensity was not statistically significant.It attributed to the offset between scarcity effect and the capital effect,which led to the insignificance of comprehensive effect.Considering the regions at different stages of economic development,the scarcity effect and capital effect caused by urban expansion were constantly changing.Thus,when making policies,we should pay more attention to how to play positive role of urban expansion and to weaken its negative effects in order to ensure food security effectively.When investigating the regulating effect of the mediating variables of urban expansion on the arable land use intensity,it is found that:①When the gross value of industrial output was greater than 50.973 billion CNY,the bias effect of urban expansion on the arable land use intensity was negative;that is,urban expansion led to a decrease in the intensity of arable land use.On the contrary,urban expansion would increase the arable land use intensity.②When the total agricultural machinery power was greater than 816.39 kW/km 2,urban expansion would promote the increase of arable land use intensity;on the contrary,urban expansion would hinder the increase of arable land use intensity.③When the average cultivated land per household was less than 3.36 mu or more than 13.26 mu,urban expansion would have a positive impact on the arable land use intensity.On the contrary,when the average cultivated land per household was between 3.36 and 6.16 mu,urban expansion would negatively affect the arable land use intensity.In order to guide the positive role of urban expansion in agricultural investment,it is necessary to coordinate urban expansion and industrial development,improve the level of regional agricultural mechanization,rely on the circulation of agricultural land to achieve a moderate scale of agricultural land management,and at the same time complete basic farmland and urban development boundary demarcation work in the rapid industrial development region as soon as possible.
作者
易家林
郭杰
欧名豪
沈璐丹
YI Jia-lin;GUO Jie;OU Ming-hao;SHEN Lu-dan(College of Land Management,Nanjing Agricultural University,Nanjing Jiangsu 210095,China;Center of Urban-rural Joint Development and Land Management Innovation,Nanjing Jiangsu 210095,China;State and Local Joint Engineering Research Center of Rural Land Resources Utilization and Consolidation,Nanjing Jiangsu 210095,China)
出处
《中国人口·资源与环境》
CSSCI
CSCD
北大核心
2018年第11期56-64,共9页
China Population,Resources and Environment
基金
国家自然科学基金项目"基于建设用地扩张对区域粮食生产影响评估的主体功能区差别化管制研究--以江苏省为例"(批准号:71774085)
"农村建设用地发展权转移增值收益共享研究:形成机理
分配策略及治理机制"(批准号:71774086)
江苏高校哲学社会科学优秀创新团队"城乡统筹与农村土地制度创新"(批准号:2015ZSTD004)
中国科学院重点实验室开放基金项目"建设用地扩张对区域粮食生产影响评估及其差别化管制"(批准号:WSAS2017003)
关键词
城市扩张
耕地利用强度
农户资源禀赋
双向固定效应
交互项
urban expansion
arable land use intensity
farmers’resource endowments
two-way fixed effects model
interaction terms