期刊文献+

自我感知歧视感量表的汉化及信效度评价 被引量:6

Chinese localization and evaluation of reliability and validity of Perceived Stigmatization Questionnaire
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的]翻译并修订自我感知歧视感量表(PSQ),并对修订后的量表进行信效度评价。[方法]遵循跨文化翻译原则,对量表进行翻译、修订、回译、再修订,采用便利抽样,对四川省某三级甲等医院的122例外观异常的病人进行调查,评价量表的信效度。[结果]汉化后的中文版自我感知歧视感量表水平的内容效度指数为1.00,条目水平的内容效度指数为0.83~1.00。探索性因子分析共提取了4个公因子,可解释总变异的80.496%。中文版自我感知歧视感量表的重测信度为0.982,量表总的Cronbach′sα系数为0.798,4个公因子的Cronbach′sα系数分别为0.964、0.965、0.874和0.898。[结论]中文版自我感知歧视感量表具有较好的信效度,可作为评定外观异常病人自我感知歧视感的评定工具。 Objective:To translate and revise Perceived Stigmatization Questionnaire(PSQ),and to evaluate the reliability and validity of the revised scale.Methods:According to the principles of trans cultural translation,the scale was translated,revised,re translated and re revised,and a convenient sampling was used to investigate 122 patients with abnormal appearance in a third grade A hospital in Sichuan province,and the reliability and validity of the scale were evaluated.Results:The content validity index of Chinese version of PSQ was 1.00,and the content validity index of item level was 0.83~1.00.Exploratory factor analysis extracted a total of 4 common factors,which could explain 80.496%of the total variation.The retest reliability of the Chinese version of PSQ was 0.982,the total Cronbach′sαcoefficient was 0.798,and the Cronbach′sαcoefficient of 4 common factors were 0.964,0.965,0.874 and 0.898,respectively.Conclusions:The Chinese version of PSQ had good reliability and validity,and could be used as a tool to evaluate the PSQ of patients with abnormal appearance.
作者 王艳琼 黄建琼 Wang Yanqiong;Huang Jianqiong(West China Hospital,Sichuan University,Sichuan 610041 China)
出处 《护理研究》 北大核心 2018年第21期3414-3417,共4页 Chinese Nursing Research
关键词 自我感知歧视感量表 汉化 歧视感 外观异常 信度 效度 Perceived Stigmatization Questionnaire,PSQ localization sense of discrimination abnormal appearance reliability validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献36

  • 1戴海琦,张锋,陈雪枫.心理与教育测量(修订本)[M].广州:暨南大学出版社,2007:59–65.
  • 2吴明隆.SPSS统计应用实务[M].北京:科学出版社,2003..
  • 3陈孝平.外科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2004.681-683.
  • 4Gagliese L,Melzack R.Chronic pain in elderly people[J]. Pain, 1997,70( 1 ) :3-4.
  • 5Fink R. Pain assessment:the cornerstone to optional pain man- agement[J]. Proc(Bayl Univ Med Cent),2000,13(3):236-239.
  • 6Gentile DA,Woodhouse J,Lynch P. Reliability and validity of the global pain scale with chronic pain sufferers[J]. Pain Phy- sician, 2011,14 : 61-70.
  • 7Brislin RW.Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials[M]//Triandis HC,Berry JW.Handbook of crosseuhural psychology: methodology. Boston,MA: Allyn & Bacon,1980:389- 444.
  • 8Beaton DE,Bombardier C,Guillemin F,et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of selfreport measures[J]. Spine, 2000,25 (24) :3186-3191.
  • 9Waltz CF,Striekland OL,Lenz ER. Measurement in nursing and health research[M]. 3rd ed. New York:Springer Publishing Co, 2005.
  • 10Lynn MR. Determination and quantification [J] Nursing Res, 1986,35(6) :382-385.

共引文献138

同被引文献58

引证文献6

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部