期刊文献+

围绝经期评定量表Menopause Rating Scale(MRS)中文版信度及效度分析 被引量:10

Reliability and validity analysis of the Menopause Rating Scale(MRS)Chinese version of the perimenopausal rating scale
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的]测定围绝经期评定量表(MRS)中文版的信度和效度。[方法]应用MRS中文版对126例围绝经期女性进行测量,对测定结果进行信度和效度分析。[结果]MRS中文版总的Cronbach′sα系数为0.890,3个维度的Cronbach′sα系数为0.731~0.868;总问卷的重测信度为0.887,3个维度的重测信度为0.661~0.883;探索性因子分析表明MRS中文版包括3个因子,共11个条目;3个因子可以解释总方差的73.68%;验证性因子分析显示数据拟合良好(χ2/df为1.170,近似误差均方根(RMSEA)为0.050,规范拟合指数(NFI)为0.894。[结论]MRS中文版具有良好的信度和效度,适合测量中国围绝经期妇女的生活质量。 Objective:To measure the reliability and validity of Chinese version of Menopause Rating Scale.Methods:A total of 126 cases of peri menopausal women were evaluated by using MRS,and the results were analyzed on the reliability and validity.Results:The total Cronbach′s coefficient of Chinese version of Menopause Rating Scale was 0.890,Cronbach′s coefficient of three dimensions was 0.731~0.868;the retest reliability of the total questionnnire was 0.887,the retest reliability of three dimensions was 0.661~0.883.Exploratory factor analysis showed the Chinese version of Menopause Rating Scale included three factors totally 11 items;the three factors could explain 73.68%of the total variance;Confirmatory factor analysis showed good data fit.Conclusions:Chinese version of Menopause Rating Scale had better reliability and validity,and suitable for measurement of quality of life of peri menopausal women in China.
作者 黄琳 刘琴 刘月 Huang Lin;Liu Qin;Liu Yue(Nursing College of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Sichuan 611137 China)
出处 《护理研究》 北大核心 2018年第21期3435-3437,共3页 Chinese Nursing Research
基金 成都中医药大学校基金资助项目 编号:ZRQN1413
关键词 围绝经期 围绝经期评定量表(MRS) 生活质量 信度 效度 peri menopausal period Menopause Rating Scale,MRS quality of life reliability validity
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献27

  • 1杨洪艳,成芳平,王小云,温泽淮,张春玲.绝经期生存质量量表中文版本的临床应用与评价[J].中华流行病学杂志,2005,26(1):47-50. 被引量:71
  • 2Zollner YF,Acquadro C,Schaefer M.Literature review of instruments to assess health-related quality of life during and after menopause.Qual Life Res,2005,14:309-327.
  • 3Buckler H.The menopause transition:endocrine changes and clinical symptoms.J Br Menopause Soc,2005,11:61-65.
  • 4Castelo-Branco C,Cancelo MJ,Chedraui P.Female sexual dysfunction in postmenopausal women.Expert Opin Ther Pat,2007,17:639-647.
  • 5Elizabeth MA.How to assess quality of life? Aspects of methodology.International Congress Series,2002,1229:31-37.
  • 6Schneider H,Rosemeier HP,Schnitker J,et al.Application and factor analysis of the menopause rating scale[MRS] in a post-marketing surveillance study of Climen.Maturitas,2000,37:113-124.
  • 7Heinemann K,Ruebig A,Potthoff P,et al.The Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) scale:A methodological review.Health and Quality of Life Outcomes,2004,2:45-53.
  • 8Kakkar V,Kaur D,Chopra K,et al.Assessment of the variation in menopausal symptoms with age,education and working/non-working status in north-Indian sub population using menopause rating scale (MRS).Maturitas,2007,57:306-314.
  • 9Daniela J,Andrea F,Rodrigo F,et al.Is the Menopause Rating Scale accurate for diagnosing sexual dysfunction among climacteric women? Maturitas,2009,62:321-323.
  • 10Castelo-Branco C ,Cancelo MJ,Chedraui P.Female sexual dysfunction in postmenopausal women[J]. Expert Opin Ther Pat,2007,17:639-647.

共引文献41

同被引文献130

引证文献10

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部