摘要
循证医学要求对现有临床证据进行综合评价以指导临床实践。临床文献的正确评价不但有利于临床指南的制定,也有利于临床决策。目前存在的诸多文献评价系统虽然方便了临床文献的评价,但对于文献评价过程中有争议证据的评价却没有合适的解决方法。本文介绍一种新的文献评价系统,将该系统的文献评价方式及有争议证据的评价方式进行介绍,为我国临床工作人员和政策制定者开展文献评价工作提供参考。
Evidence-based medicine is an approach to medical practice intended to optimize decision-making by evaluating currently available evidence.Proper evaluation of clinical literature could not only facilitate development of clinical guidelines,but also help make good decision of medical practice.Although current literature-evaluating systems improve the progress of literature evaluation,but it is still unsolvable to correctly resolve the uncertainty between different opinions.This article is to introduce a new literature-evaluating system by elaborating how it grades literature and how it resolves the dispute between different opinions,which might help clinical practitioners and policy makers make better decisions.
作者
王一飞
何少茹
WANG Yi-fei;HE Shao-ru(Pediatrics Department,Guangdong General Hospital,Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences,Guangzhou 510080,China)
出处
《循证医学》
CSCD
2018年第5期309-315,共7页
The Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine
关键词
循证医学
文献
评价
evidence-based medicine
literature
evaluation