预期违约之废除——以保留《合同法》第68条不安抗辩权为基础

The Abolishment of Anticipatory Breach——Based on maintaining the 68th article about discomposure deraignment in Contract Law

我国在《合同法》第68条和第108条分别规定了不安抗辩权和预期违约,这两种制度在解决问题的目的和方式上具有相似性,学界对于预期违约和不安抗辩权的废存存在相当大的争议,司法实践中难以抉择二者如何适用。为了解决二者在《民法典·合同法编》中的矛盾和冲突问题,应删除《合同法》预期违约的规定,并对不安抗辩权中的缺漏进行修改和补充。

Discomposure deraignment and anticipatory breach are regulated in Article 68 and 108 of Chinese Contract Law,which are similar in the aim and methods of problem settlement.There is controversy in the academic field on whether these two systems should be abolished or not and it is difficult to decide how to use them in judicial practice.In order to solve the contradiction and conflicts of them in Civil Law,the regulations on anticipatory breach in Contract La*w should be abolished and discomposure deraignment should be revised and supplemented.